Posted by: Lisa Hill | November 26, 2017

What’s Yours is Mine, Against the Sharing Economy (2017), by Tom Slee

I thought I didn’t need to read What’s Yours is Mine, Against the Sharing Economy.  I felt instinctively that AirBnB and Uber were a bad idea, and I’ve never used them.  But lots of people do – and it turns out that I have unwittingly been a participant contributing content to a sharing business (i.e. Goodreads).  These disruptive business models are now global, and spawning offspring of all kinds.  Tom Slee tackles the phenomenon and exposes it for what it is.

In the preface, which updates developments since the book was first published in the US, Slee reiterates the attractive promises of the Sharing Economy (which we all know so I won’t repeat them) and then shows how the idealistic communitarian and co-operative vision has been hijacked.

Unfortunately, something different and altogether darker is happening: the Sharing Economy is extending a harsh and deregulated free market into previously protected areas of our lives.  The leading companies are now corporate juggernauts themselves, and are taking a more and more intrusive role in the exchanges they support to make their money and to maintain their brand.  As the Sharing Economy grows, it is reshaping cities without regard to those things that make then liveable.  Rather than bringing a new openness and personal trust to our interactions, it is bringing a new form of surveillance where service workers must live in fear of being snitched on, and while the company CEOs talk benevolently of their community of users, the reality has a harder edge of centralised control.  Sharing Economy marketplaces are generating new and ever-more-entitled forms of consumption.  The language of ‘a little extra money’ turns out to be the same as that used about women’s jobs forty years ago, when they were not seen as ‘real’ jobs that demanded a living wage, and so did not need to be treated the same, or paid as much, as men’s jobs. Instead of freeing individuals to take control over their own lives, many Sharing Economy companies are making big money for their investors and executives, and making good jobs for their software engineers and marketers, by removing the protections and assurances won by decades of struggle, by creating riskier and more precarious forms of low-paid work for those who actually work in the Sharing Economy.  (p.3)

The chapter about AirBnB is instructive, and it confirms stories that I’m starting to see in the media.  Just last week I read about a council trying to control the endless AirBnB partying that is destroying the lifestyle of genuine residents in a popular tourist destination.  There are accusations that there’s a link between housing affordability and AirBnB because investors are buying up property for short term accommodation rather than making it available for residential living.  AirBnB is not bound by anti-discrimination laws and there are cases of long-term renters being evicted so that the landlord can list the property on AirBnB. What’s interesting is that far from disrupting ‘big business’ i.e. hotel chains, the economy that’s suffering is the small B-and-Bs and the small indie hotels who complain that they have to register with their city, have the expense of passing fire inspections and health and safety inspections, and have to pay tourist taxes, so cannot compete with the unregistered apartment down the street that has none of these expenses. And since AirBnB is not the intimate, folksy company it purports to be, it demands eternal growth and therefore it must expand.  As this Harvard Business Review article explains, if everyone around you in your Paris AirBnB is also an AirBnB tourist, they erode the very atmosphere in which they bask and threaten the liveability of the city for residents.  The problem has reached epic proportions in Amsterdam.

Chapter 4 is called ‘On the Move with Uber’.  The amount of money behind this brand is breathtaking and if you already know about problems with uninsured drivers and attacks on women, perhaps then the deal to get rid of drivers by using self-driving cars may surprise you.

Uber enthusiasts attribute the company’s success to its technology, and the efficiency with which it matches drivers and riders, but this misses much of the story.  Uber’s success owes a lot to avoiding the costs of insurance, sales tax [LH: in Australia, GST], mechanical vehicle inspections, and providing a universally-accessible service.   (p.53)

This last one really bothers me. At the community centre where I learn French, they run art classes for disabled people, and all of them arrive by taxi.  The Sharing Economy is not interested in providing affordable transport for these people and it doesn’t care if it puts the taxi companies that do serve them out of business.  In Australia we have a long tradition of subsidising each other to make life more liveable for all of us.  Our stamps cover the cost of delivering a letter to remote communities just the same as delivering it round the corner in the suburbs.  A small part of business costs (which impacts on the price of goods we buy) is to cover the costs of disabled toilets and lifts so that everyone has access.  And we pay a bit more when we ride in a profitable taxi to subsidise the unprofitable people-movers that disabled people use.

But there’s more to it than that.  Taxis in cities are part of an integrated transport system.  Cities regulate for standards: knowledge of routes and destinations, vehicle safety, driver screening, insurance, universal access which means safety seats for babies and vehicle design as well as anti-discrimination provisions, not to mention providing a service to all areas of a city.  There are always going to be problems but all of these standards are enforceable with sanctions because the system ensures accountability.  But they also regulate for the protection of the drivers, and for environmental concerns, (such as pollution controls on cars in the fleet), for traffic management and congestion.  Uber doesn’t comply with any of this…

Plus, taxi companies pay tax which contributes to the well-being of everyone in the community, and individual taxi drivers pay income tax too.  But through a complex system of subsidiaries, Uber avoids contributing anything in the way of tax to the cities where it operates.  You might think that’s ok, if you believe that Uber is just mums and dads making a little cash by using their own cars.  But Uber is a private company which in April 2017 admitted that … Net revenue was $6.5 billion, while adjusted net losses were $2.8 billion… And they’re not even contributing to maintaining and developing the road infrastructure they’re using to make this obscene amount of money!

So who are the winners if the taxi industry fails?

Not, apparently, the drivers.  You’ll have to read the book to see the maths (and the tortuous process of getting any information out of Uber itself) but the evidence is that Uber is not going to end the era of poorly paid cab drivers any time soon.   A US journalist tracked her own expenses and of others who shared them with her and what she found was that she made about $17 per hour gross, after Uber’s 28% cut and the 19% that went to expenses she ended up with just $9.34 an hour.

The really sad part is that former taxi drivers in some places have had to work with Uber because taxi income in their city has fallen and they can’t get any other unskilled work.  Just another 21st century example of people doing the same work for less money and becoming the working poor.

There is so much more to this book, and it’s one that I think should be widely read, but before I end this over-long review there are a couple more things to note: the chapter called Strangers Trusting Strangers, is in part about the ubiquitous business of rating everything we do these days.

The broad-brush talk of trust misses the point that most regulations exist to screen those things that customers cannot see for themselves.  Most tourists cannot assess whether their accommodations are properly protected in case of fire, restaurant customers will not know whether the kitchen handles food properly, taxi passengers will not know whether the brakes of their car are in good condition, and most will never find out.  Ratings will never solve these problems, and for this reason alone algorithmic regulation is a non-starter.

Reputation systems are also the wrong tool to deal with extreme failures of trust.  A one-star rating is no way to deal with assault, fraud or theft, for which reparations and even prosecution are required.  (p. 91)

The example given is shocking: a 19 year old was sexually assaulted by his AirBnB host in Spain.  He texted his mother in the US that he’d been locked in, and when she called AirBnB they told her to get in touch with the police.  Well, so she should have, and so should he in the first place, and if he didn’t know how to do that then he was pitifully unprepared for foreign travel.  But that’s not the point: the point is that AirBnB takes no responsibility for what happens, and a rating system is not going fix this kind of breach of trust.

The chapter about how open-source software often isn’t,  is an eye-opener, especially if you’re interested in creative culture.

The rise of the amateur, of openness, and of free culture has not been at the expense of the blockbuster, but has instead led to a ‘missing middle’.  Those who look to make a living in a modest way from their art (or from their role in the creative process as booksellers, editors, and so on) have found themselves on the outside of all these changes.  As Andrew Franklin of independent publisher Profile said in 2014:

The large bestselling authors are taking a bigger and bigger share of the market.  Just as in every branch of post-industrial capitalism, the rich are getting richer.  New authors and struggling authors and mid-list authors are finding it harder. This [is] bad news for the average writer: they get paid less so that publishing houses can hold onto bestsellers with higher advances.  (p.125)

The irony is that even the most rapacious proponents of the Sharing Economy can read this book for free.  They can (in Australia, anyway) go to the library to borrow it – because libraries are financed by a community of ratepayers who share the cost even if they don’t use the library.  And ironically the creators of the book’s content will be paid (in Australia, anyway) because libraries pay the authors and publishers through the Public Lending Right scheme.

That’s definitely not the kind of sharing that the Sharing Economy represents.  The Sharing Economy is really about someone, somewhere, making a lot money out of it.

Update: another disturbing report about Uber

Update#2: And one about AirBnB

Author: Tom Slee
Title: What’s Yours is Mine, Against the Sharing Economy
Publisher: Scribe, 2017
ISBN: 9781925322644
Review copy courtesy of Scribe Publishing

Available from Fishpond: What’s Yours is Mine: Against the Sharing Economy



  1. There are many conversations happening around AirBnB and Uber. I know Hobart is feeling the pinch of everything being rented to tourists. Where does it all stop? I am not sure.


    • Well, you can count on me to stay at the same Tassie B&Bs I’ve always stayed at (as long as they’re still operating, that is).


      • You must let me know when you are next here. I can shout you coffee and cake at my favourite book store, Fullers. 🐧🐧🐧


  2. Wow. Thanks for the eye-opener.


  3. Sounds like a must-read. Thanks for highlighting the importance of affordable transport for the disabled. With a non-verbal, autistic adult son, transport that is both affordable and safe is essential. The thought of being forced into using something like Uber – well, that’s just unthinkable.


    • Hello Karen, I think the thing is that many people may not realise the consequences of the choices they make. Of course we’ve all had bad experiences in taxis and I understand the temptation to choose something cheaper, but at the end of the day we need to stick together as communities to make sure that everyone’s needs are met.


  4. When Uber arrived in Perth the government just rolled over and let it happen – partly I think because the labour intensive inspectorates that used to control health and safety etc have all been dismantled and so even if the government attempted to regulate ride sharing they would have no way of enforcing it. It will take us more than a generation to get back to liveable mixed economies, but the tide is turning (I hope!).


    • I think it takes a global response, and yes, we are starting to see that with tentative united steps towards making these large unaccountable companies pay some tax…


  5. It’s interesting that Uber – which we didn’t use for a long time because of concerns and have only used a few times – has resulted in the taxi industry lifting its game. Taxis now – in many jurisdictions anyhow – offer tracking software so you can see where your taxi is and when it is arriving. Taxis for so long offered pretty poor service, so I can understand why people, particularly younger ones wanting to go out drinking or young women wanting to get home safely (though safety has always been one of my Uber concerns) took up Uber with a vengeance. We used Uber a few times when we were holidaying in the USA, and it offers flexible employment for people who need it – we met single parent students working hard to make ends meet, and older people needing to top up they generally poor retirement accounts. Uber has been a godsend for them. However, with the improved service offered by taxis, and my preference for what I feel is the extra security taxis offer, we will continue to prefer taxis. Also Uber is not necessarily much cheaper – at least not in places where it is more regulated.

    AirBnB is an interesting one. Again we have used it – for longer term stays. Good hotels can be expensive and not particularly conducive to stays of 5-10 days, and those small B&Bs can be in out of the way places when you are visiting a city. Motels can be uninviting, and again not particularly wonderful for longer stays, though we’ve done it. AirBnBs offer the comfort of a bit more space, the ability to cook your own meals (which we rarely do, I admit, besides breakfast) and, most importantly, laundry facilities. This is a BIG issue (for me anyhow). It’s so nice not having to hunt down a laundromat! BUT I’ve been watching the articles over the last year or so, and seeing the impacts the business is having. It’s gone from what started as a friendly sharing economy to being big business disrupting residential communities and housing availability – and I’m concerned about the direction it’s taking. For our first Melbourne trips to visit the kid/s we used a motel, then we tried AirBnBs (including one owned by a friend – their Melbourne pad offered as AirBnB when they aren’t there), and most recently, commercial suites (like Mantra) which are often well located and priced OK in comparison with AirBnBs. (We are vaguely considering buying our own Melbourne pad, with two children now ensconced there, but have decided we won’t run it as an AirBnB!)

    I certainly agree that we should consider the implications of our decisions, and that these companies should be financially accountable, but I don’t necessarily think that the decisions are easy black and white ones.


    • Well, I think the point that you made, that it was different in the beginning, is what Slee is really on about. In the initial phase, it seems like a good idea, perhaps because most of us would have thought we could have both, an informal sharing economy as well as the professional businesses which – as you say with taxis – needed to lift their game. But as these things have become entrenched and have expanded beyond what was expected, all these problems are starting to surface.
      When I was in Geelong last weekend and I felt unwell, there was not a taxi to be had to get me back to my hotel. Even if I’d thought of Uber, I don’t have the App on my phone…


      • (See I didn’t get notification of this response though Im sure I clicked the Notify me box as I always do, with the very rare forgetful exception).

        But, yes to all that. Having to manage all these apps is another bother in our lives!! (I now have three parking apps on my phone, and I couldn’t use one the other day because it had signed me out and I didn’t remember my login details. Of course, if I had one of those password storage apps on my phone …. (but I don’t, I only have some software on my laptop.)


        • I think there are more and more services that are only offered by phone. I was rather aghast to hear on local radio that people are getting fined for not re-registering their cars because they’re not getting paper reminders. Just imagine all the oldies who don’t play on the internet driving around in unregistered cars… and thus won’t have 3rd party insurance to cover the accidents they have!


          • Yes, this transition period is awful, particularly for those 60 plus many of whom are not well-versed or comfortable with technology. I am regularly fixing my parents’ iPad problems but fortunately they don’t do anything more serious than emails, playing games (MUM), checking sports scores and stock exchange (Dad)! It’s really tough – and, as you say, risky. (I got this notification in my WordPress notification centre.)


            • Imagine twenty years from now when we can’t remember our passwords!


  6. […] Book That Scares You: What’s Yours is Mine, Against the Sharing Economy by Tom Slee.  This book showed me what we risk losing if we let the sharing economy run on unchecked.  I wish […]


  7. […] the cover of What’s Yours is Mine, equally simple, and probably equally cheap to do since it also just uses text, tells you a lot […]


  8. […] What’s Yours is Mine, Against the Sharing Economy, by Tom Slee […]


  9. […] articulated my misgivings in his book What’s Yours is Mine, Against the Sharing Economy. (See my review, about 2/3 down the page.) Slee says reputation systems are also the wrong tool to deal with extreme failures of trust. […]


Please share your thoughts and join the conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: