Posted by: Lisa Hill | May 12, 2024

Clear, (2024) by Carys Davies

#Blush Late for Paula’s Dewithon at Book Jotter by over a month, this is my 13th review of a novel by a Welsh author.  Carys Davies’ Clear is her third novel… her debut was West, (2018) which was shortlisted for the Folio Prize, longlisted for the European Literature Prize, Runner Up for the Society of Authors’ McKitterick Prize, and winner of the Wales Book of the Year for Fiction. Her second novel The Mission House was The Sunday Times 2020 Novel Of The Year, and I reviewed it here.

While her style and preoccupations are different, Davies is like the Irish writer Clare Keegan in the sense that she writes short novels and novellas with poetic clarity where not a word is wasted, and while both writers set their fiction in the past, these ‘historical novels’ are more about a reckoning with the past.  In Clear, Davies brings us the human story behind the notorious clearances that denuded Scotland of its rural population in the 18th and 19th century. As she explains in the Author’s Note at the back of the book:

Whole communities of the rural poor were forcibly removed from their homes by landowners in a relentless programme of coercive and systematic dispossession to make way for crops, cattle and — increasingly as time went on — sheep. (p.148)

Davies constructs her story around another cataclysmic event in Scotland: the Disruption of 1843 when 474 evangelical ministers broke away from the Church of Scotland to form the Free Church of Scotland.  In the story, John Ferguson joins this movement, in revolt against landowners’ rights to confer clerical livings to suit themselves. His decision means the loss of home and income, and so it is that his brother-in-law wangles a job for him, to tide him over his more-than-awkward financial situation.

The job is to sail to a (fictional) remote northern island between Shetland and Norway, to dispossess the sole remaining inhabitant.  It seems an unchristian task for a devout minister to take on, but John Ferguson is naïve about what’s involved (and not just because the landowner Henry Lowrie and his factor Strachan were evasive about it).  John is also desperate, distraught about the financial plight inflicted on his beloved wife Mary.  And, for a man of faith, it is also a means to an end… the sixteen pounds is not just for them, it is also a substantial amount to begin setting up the infrastructure for the new church.

The story weaves between three perspectives: that of John Ferguson; of his more clear-sighted wife Mary and of the sole inhabitant, Ivar.  It begins with John Ferguson on a small boat on rough seas, wishing that he could swim.  Soaked to the skin he makes his way to shelter for the night.  Ivar knows nothing about his arrival until he discovers the unconscious and battered body of John at the bottom of a cliff.  And as the illiterate last speaker of the Norn language with no knowledge of English, Ivar has no means of making sense of John’s scattered possessions, even if the print had not been washed away from the official notice of eviction.

Mary, meanwhile, has no knowledge of John’s progress, but her doubts and suspicions about the whole project propel her towards a journey of her own.

Clear is compulsive reading as each character confronts risk but behaves in unexpected ways that testify to their intrinsic humanity. It’s almost certainly counter-factual to what actually happened during those devastating clearances that Mary has heard about.  But the novella is not naïve.  It is transformative.

It’s difficult to find an excerpt that doesn’t give away elements of the plot, but the dark humour of Mary’s first meeting with John fits the bill…

She was forty-three when a dentist told her that the only way to relieve her dental pain was to take out five of her front teeth, two at the top and three at the bottom. 

Mary nodded.

She had never thought of herself as vain, but she thought now that perhaps she was. (p.57)

Since Mary can’t afford porcelain replacements in an ivory setting at twenty-five shillings, she agrees to an experimental alternative — false teeth made with ‘vulcanite rubber’ for seven and sixpence…

Her new teeth were in her mouth when one of the Comrie earthquakes struck (the big one that caused a breach in the dam near Stirling) — BOOM! — as if the small public hall where she was sitting had been smacked by a giant hand or crashed into by some enormous object, bringing down the ceiling in a shower of laths and plaster and sending door handles and window glass flying. Her chair collapsed beneath her and her new teeth shot out of her mouth, and in the dust and debris she couldn’t find them.

It seemed like an exceptionally bad piece of luck, to lose so many teeth in a single year, but as she brushed the powdery white mess from the broad skirt of her dress a tall, thin, serious-faced man in a white neckcloth and a black-buttoned coat appeared in front of her, carrying her teeth aloft like a crown, or a rescued child, asking if they were hers. (p.58)

Clear has also been reviewed at A Life in Books and Tony’s Book World.

Author: Carys Davies
Title: Clear
Publisher: Granta, 2024
Cover design by Anna Green
ISBN: 9781803510408, hbk., 154 pages
Source: Kingston Library

 

Posted by: Lisa Hill | May 11, 2024

The Anniversary (2023), by Stephanie Bishop

An enticing review at Reading Matters was the catalyst for me to read Stephanie Bishop’s fourth novel, The Anniversary.  

For some bizarre reason, the library has put one of its ‘crime genre’ stickers on it, a symbol of a pistol.  (I’m a bit baffled by the cover art too.)

In Book One, we meet Lucie a.k.a. J B Blackwood en route to collect a major literary prize.  She’s on a cruise ship with her auteur-husband Patrick, trying to revive their May-September marriage which is a bit rocky lately as her career blooms and his is fading.  She’s been sworn to secrecy by her publisher Ada, so Patrick doesn’t know about the prize because, says Ada, he is a total gossip, and because he loves you so much.  The plan is that she will fly on to New York for the awards ceremony at the end of the cruise.

And that’s what she does, when the cruise comes to a premature end for her because Patrick is washed overboard in a ferocious storm. And then she does the publicity events at bookshops and on TV.

Yes.

That is not what a grieving widow is supposed to do.

The narration is brilliant. Are we reading the confused, distraught, occasionally drunken muddle of events from someone in shock? Or are we reading the words of a woman who mines her own life for her next novel? Or, is the whole thing a smokescreen designed to hide the truth of what happened on that night — from the authorities and from those whose love and respect she wants to keep?

As Lucie backtracks over the mess of her memories, she reveals the tensions in a power relationship that shifts.  What starts out as mentoring in a creative relationship that becomes collaborative, morphs into exploitation over the years. As manager of the household while Patrick flits about the world making impressive films, Lucie begins to find her creative independence restricted.

There’s more to it than that.  But The Anniversary is a beautifully written, cunningly constructed novel that messes with your head and it deserves to be read on its own terms.

PS The Anniversary was longlisted for the 2024 Stella Prize.

Author: Stephanie Bishop
Title: The Anniversary
Publisher: Hachette, 2023
Cover design by Christabella
ISBN: 9780733649165, pbk., 424 pages
Source: Kingston Library

Posted by: Lisa Hill | May 11, 2024

Spell the Month in Books May 2024 Linkup

Spell the Month in Books is a linkup hosted on Reviews From the Stacks on the first Saturday of each month, but that’s the day for #6Degrees, so here we are, a week later instead.

This month was easy because self-evidently May has only three letters — and the theme is Nature which lends itself to both fiction and non-fiction.

Can I do it with all Australian books? Yes, I can!

Links go to my reviews.

Margaret Flockton, a Fragrant Memory by Louise Wilson.  Margaret Flockton was  a botanical artist (1861-1953) whose contribution to understanding the flora of Australia is remarkable.

Australia’s First Naturalists, Indigenous People’s Contribution to early Zoology by Penny Olsen and Lynette Russell

The Year of the Farmer by Rosalie Ham.  I was reminded just last weekend by a visit from in-laws that farmers have an intimate knowledge of nature and its vagaries.

Thanks again to Jennifer for reminding me.  Her May list is here.

I have said that I will not host discussion about current wars,  but I have also always said that I confront antisemitism whenever I come across it.  It’s personal for me: I have relations who are ‘Jewish enough’ to have perished in the Holocaust.  And among the miscellany of my friends of all faiths but mostly of none, I have Jewish friends.

But confronting antisemitism is also a moral issue.  We cannot recoil in horror from Germany’s industrial scale murder of six million Jews without recognising that we have a moral responsibility to do what ordinary Germans did not do: to confront antisemitism even when it’s difficult.

Which is why I am drawing your attention to the latest issue of the long-form-essay Jewish Quarterly.

I’m not Jewish, but my niece converted to Judaism to marry the love of her life, and she lives in London.  She has three school age children and it is from her and reports from my local friends, that I know that amid a fog of propaganda this essay is highlighting the truth about the rise of overt and sometimes violent antisemitism.

Blindness, October 7 and the Left is by Hadley Freeman, and I read most of it not realising that she was a woman. (As I found out when I Googled her), at The Guardian, (which she has now abandoned) she has written some notable articles about celebrities and A-listers, people I would not recognise if I saw them on the street, from Michael J Fox  to Ben Affleck and Keanu Reeves.  At The Guardian these pieces are below the news and I don’t even scroll down past the headlines to look at them.  I don’t do popular culture.

But Blindness, October 7 and the Left is deadly serious stuff.  This is the blurb:

After October 7, many on the left justified, dismissed or championed acts and beliefs they would otherwise view as unconscionable. Why?

This issue of The Jewish Quarterly explores the response of the left to the Hamas attacks in Israel of October 7 and the willingness of progressives to abandon values that they purport to represent.

In this crucial essay, author and columnist Hadley Freeman examines the equivocations, contortions and hypocrisy displayed by elements of the left, including many who were unable to name, acknowledge or condemn the atrocities of Hamas.

Freeman looks at the beliefs and mindsets that have swept across sectors such as universities, politics, media and the arts, and resulted in a fervour that blinds its adherents to the realities and complexities of history and justice.

I have always been ‘a bit of a Leftie’ though these days I’m more inclined to say that I’m ‘in the middle of the left-hand lane’.  I’ve been to my share of demos: I stood beside my friends at continuing vigils for the Tiananmen Square atrocity; and at the vigil for freedom of speech after the Charlie Hebdo shooting by Islamic terrorists in Paris, I was pleased to see that Melbourne had turned out to support our small but vibrant French community here.

Will Melbourne turn out at the forthcoming Never Again is Now rally next weekend?

It’s not about the war in the Middle East.
It’s not about Middle Eastern politics.
It’s not about wanting peace or a just and lasting resolution to the conflict.
It’s about our society, the one we live in, and the social cohesion we cherish.
And the safety and security of all the communities who live among us.


Author: Hadley Freeman
Title: Blindness, October 7 and the Left (Jewish Quarterly Feb 2024)
Edited by Jonathan Pearlman
Publisher:  Morry Schwarz,  2024
ISBN: 9781760644369, pbk., 86 pages
Source: Subscription

Posted by: Lisa Hill | May 8, 2024

The Necessary Angel (2017), by C.K. Stead

What a pleasure it was to read this sparkling campus novel set at the Sorbonne in Paris!
C.K. (Karl) Stead (b.1932) is one of New Zealand’s most esteemed authors and now I know why.  The brief bio in the book tells me that he’s the only NZ author to be have been both Poet Laureate and winner of the Prime Minister’s award for fiction.

(That award BTW is not for a book, it’s for a body of work, similar to the Melbourne Prize. Previous winners include some reviewed on this blog: Janet Frame, Maurice Gee, Patricia Grace, Fiona Farrell, Lloyd Jones, Fiona Kidman, Owen Marshall and Witi Ihimaera.  So he’s in very good company.)

Stead is prolific too. He writes  novels, poetry, short stories, and literary criticism, and pages at the back of the book list 16 poetry collections, 16 novels, 8 works of literary criticism, an autobiography, and half a dozen books that he edited.  His Wikipedia page is a bit of mess because they listed his works chronologically rather than grouping them, plus they’ve got the date of this one wrong. There are too many novels to list, but I have The Death of the Body on the TBR, and maybe I’ll get to it during this #YearOfNZLit...

So… The Necessary Angel is Stead’s sixteenth novel — a campus novel set in 2014 that explores passion, fidelity, betrayal and jealousy; the daily presence of books and authors in the lives of people who love literature; the dynamics of interpersonal power; and the complexities of living in contemporary Europe, from an outsider’s point-of-view.  There’s also a nice little mystery that hums along beside the main narrative.

I’ve noted that the complexities of Paris are observed by an outsider, but Max Jackson, who lectures in English Literature at the Sorbonne, is a New Zealander who’s lived in France for a long time. But he still has Kiwi attitudes — which he often keeps to himself, especially the constant irritation of being mistaken for a Brit, but also the discrepancy between the shabby memorial to Katherine Mansfield naming her as a wife rather than the brilliant modernist author that she was, and the ostentatious grandiosity of a memorial to a cult ‘philosopher-guru’ called Gurdjieff.

And though the day came when he could wander around the streets feeling relaxed instead of having to keep his bearings in mind, and he knows the unspoken rules of French restaurants, he is still not comfortable at ritual observances such as a funeral.  He has a French wife and French children who cooperate with their mother’s quixotic dress rules with the glum compliance of the French child which Max always found surprising.  A note at the beginning of the story tells us that the characters speak in French unless otherwise noted, but though Max is fluent, he can’t follow teenage urban slang and he sometimes ponders the difference between effortlessly learning a mother tongue and the process of learning another language in adulthood.

Despite this, Max engages in deliciously witty and cerebral conversations about books.  Having abandoned poetry, he is writing literary criticism about Doris Lessing and V S Naipaul.  His wife, Louise, from whom he is estranged since being banished to the ground floor of their apartment, is working on a novel by Flaubert, and she hopes that the introduction she writes will resurrect interest in him.  Sylvia, part of a committee planning literary events to coincide with WW1 commemorations, is fancied by Max. She doesn’t have a passion for literature, but she does have a passion for a moody German called Bertholdt who’s working on a production of Strindberg’s Ghost Sonata. Max gets a testy response from Berholdt when he mentions with no conscious motive but a dim feeling there might be an unconscious one, that he’s reading the new novel by Martin Amis, The Zone of Interest (yes, the one that was made into the recent film).  He adds that it’s about the Holocaust, and it’s set in Auschwitz, but that’s not actually what interests Max about the book.  It’s the story: with a plot element omitted from the film… that the camp commandant had engaged a Jewish inmate to kill his unfaithful wife, in exchange for which he would save the inmate’s wife from her fate.

Fidelity is on Max’s mind. As well it might be.  In the space of the novel he beds two different women.  Oblivious to the #MeToo movement and modern conceptions of power relationships between students and teachers, he has a fling with an English student called Helen White, who told him at their first meeting that she was bipolar and dependent on Lithium for the stability of her mental health.  He’s twice her age, but he is astonishingly naïve about her.  He knows that if she laid a complaint he’d be in trouble, but he trusts her not to.  That trust is misplaced, in a way that is predictable, and in another way that is right out of left field.

His other conquest, Sylvie, is less vulnerable and she’s already decided that getting seriously involved with married men isn’t a future that she wants. Venturing where a wiser man would never tread, Max (in what looks like a reconciliation that is not going to last), takes his wife shopping in the same shop as favoured by Sylvie, and he buys a scarf similar to the one that Sylvie wears.  Louise who likes the husband-in-the-basement arrangement because he’s always on call, (plus, she can snoop through his belongings), but though she falls victim to dog-in-the-manger syndrome when she finds out about Max’s women, really, she is much too smart and ambitious for Max.  (Except for the way she votes, see below.)

There’s a delicious thread about French President Francois Hollande’s trio of women: his former partner Ségolène Royal who he appointed to cabinet in indecent haste after separating from his official partner Valerie Trierweiler because he had an affair with an actor called Julie Gayet. None of this is particularly scandalous, not in France… what is scandalous is that Trierweiler has written a tell-all memoir about it.  Louise changes her vote because of this: she approved of Marie le Pen’s declaration that the memoir dishonoured France…

Louise had voted for Madame Le Pen in the presidential election — another cause (one of the worst) of discord between herself and Max.  They might have voted together for the socialist Ségolène Royal; but the party had chosen Ségolène’s former husband, lover, whatever — father of her children — the ineffectual Hollande as its candidate.  Louise felt cheated, and that Ségolène had been cheated; it was time for a first female president of France, and there had been a good one on offer — capable, eloquent, intelligent, presentable.  Louise would not vote for Hollande; and she would not vote for Nicolas Sarkozy, with his tall Italian glamour-wife and his platform shoes.  So she had voted for Marine Le Pen.  (p.52.)

Objecting to Sarkozy because of his wife’s shoes… seriously?  Is that how an intelligent woman disposes of the vote denied to French women for so long?? And Le Pen?  I don’t know much about French politics, but a vote for a woman by a woman without attending to that candidate’s Far Right electoral position looks remarkably silly to me.  (Even in far away Australia, I know about Le Pen.) But we can see from Max’s futile gestures towards beggars and homeless people that contemporary France is as mean spirited and indifferent to The Other as Australia has become…

Ann Berest wrote vividly in The Postcard (see my recent review) about the discomfort of unfamiliarity with religious rituals, and Max feels it too when he attends the funeral of Louise’s uncle.  Not observant of any faith, he is particularly concerned about the effects of Catholic education on his children.

Max had an anxious thought that this might be like learning French first by ear rather than off the page — too early for the effect ever to be expunged. (p.86)

He tries to tell Louise about his anxieties during the service.

But it had just been a funeral, she said.  Something had to be done when someone died.  ‘Just think of it as an observance.’

‘Based on untruths.’

She shrugged.  The French shrug that had once seemed charming; he’d grown to dislike it. ‘So that we can all look forward to being greeted by Uncle in eternity.’

‘A figure of speech,’ she said.

‘An untruth.’

‘Don’t be such a puritan, Max.  No harm’s done.’

‘Science when it matters, and religion when it doesn’t.’

‘Have faith at least in your children’s intelligence.  They’re bright kids.  They’ll sort these things out.’

‘And it’s all in such execrable taste.’

She laughed.  It was a frosty laugh. ‘I’m always amused when you reveal that you’re a snob.’

She used the English word and he asked what on earth she meant.

‘The snobbery of good taste,’ she said.

‘Oh that? Yes, I hope so.’ (p.88)

Ouch!!

I loved this book.  Highly recommended.

Image credit:
Katherine Mansfield’s grave: https://natlib.govt.nz/records/22845402

Author: C.K. Stead
Title: The Necessary Angel
Publisher: Allen & Unwin, 2017
Cover design: Kate Barraclough
ISBN: 9781760631529, pbk., 220 pages
Source: Personal library, purchased from Fishpond.


To discover other titles in #AYearofNZLit click the logo below.

 

Posted by: Lisa Hill | May 7, 2024

Women & Children (2023), by Tony Birch

If anything in this review raises issues for you, visit White Ribbon Australia for help in your location.

If you or someone you know is impacted by sexual assault, domestic or family violence,
call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au.
In an emergency, call 000.


Update 8/5/24: Women and Children has been awarded the Age Book of the Year (Fiction).  I am not surprised… look at the conversation this book has generated here on this blog! Congratulations Tony!


Women & Children is such a heartfelt novel, I don’t know how to write about my conflicted feelings about it.  Though I suspect it was the author’s intention, to portray with devastating clarity, how complex the issue of domestic violence is.

Women & Children is an important, powerful book that tells an important, powerful story… it’s just that I didn’t want to read a book about it right at this time when the nation is having a conversation about violence against women. There is so much about it in the news and the media and publishing and ‘entertainment’, that it is hard to hang onto the fact that most men are not violent, that violence is not normal in our society, and most men are keen to do what they can to turn things around.  I know, and understand, that part of that involves turning over the long history of denial and silence, but I wanted a break from it in my bedtime reading.

And from having heard Tony talk about the book at the Sorrento Writers Festival, where he said he didn’t want to write ‘an angry book’, I was not expecting Women & Children to be a brutal portrayal of violence on a woman’s body.  The concluding chapter is shocking.  I could not sleep without finishing it, and then I couldn’t sleep afterwards.

It’s true that it’s not an angry book.  It is, as he said, a book about love.  The love that the family has for Oona, the victim of a man’s violence, and how each of them confronts their own powerlessness to stop it.  It’s set in 1965, in what was then an inner-city working-class suburb, at a time when police indifference and corruption meant there was no support to be had from them.  The Catholic church, delivering ruthless ideology through the pulpit and the school, represents that old adage, ‘you made your bed, now you must lie in it’.  People don’t look, don’t ask, don’t interfere and their silence makes them complicit.  There’s no such thing as a women’s refuge, and feminism’s Sisterhood had not emerged so Oona and her sister don’t have a supportive network of other women around them.

(Update, later the same day: I forgot to say that Birch says this is a work of fiction and not the story of his own family…)

That setting makes me wonder why Birch chose to set his story in the past, more than half a century ago.  To show that the fundamentals of violence have not changed?  That all the efforts to change things have failed?  A woman gets beaten up, she seeks help from her family. Her sister is livid, and is determined it will never happen again. Her father is distraught that he could not protect his daughter.  And though a silence about what happened is maintained, the kids in that family are traumatised by what they see.

And then she goes back to him.

And of course it happens again.

And then it’s a case of needing to find a safe place for her to be, where he can’t find her.

We do not learn from Women & Children how Ray became a monster.  Nor do we learn about any viable solutions.

I don’t think this novel was meant to be pessimistic, and I refuse to believe that change isn’t possible.

Author: Tony Birch
Title: Women & Children
Publisher: UQP (University of Queensland Press, 2023
Cover design by Jenna Lee
ISBN: 9780702266270, hbk.,311 pages
Source: Kingston Library

I have been reading Vasily Grossman‘s novel Stalingrad for ages, because it’s 900+ pages long and it’s too heavy to hold, so I can’t read it in bed, only in the daytime, when I can rest it on a table. It’s a wonderful book, full of all sorts of insights which have nothing to do with war or the decisive Soviet defeat of the Nazis at Stalingrad in 1942.

Stalingrad (1952) is based on Grossman’s work as a war correspondent for the Red Star, and it features characters from military real life on both sides of the battle.  It is the precursor to Life and Fate (1959, see my review) which continues on with events from September 1942.  It is sobering to reach the end of a 900+ page book about the battle that changed the course of the war, and then to remember that the war in Europe was to continue for another three years.  The loss of life was appalling, and Grossman’s literary homage to the dead acknowledges these nameless heroes in unmarked graves with lively fictional characters.  But as in real life, not all of them survive.

As Robert Chandler says in his excellent introduction, Grossman is a master of character portrayal, with an unusual gift for conveying someone’s feelings through some tiny but vivid detail.

Grossman is equally deft in his shifts of perspective, moving between the microscopic and the epic and showing the same generous understanding towards his German characters as towards his Russians. (p. x)

We are privy to scenes of their family life; their transition from peasant or professor to soldiering; their privations, trials, frustrations and doubts; and their anxieties about their comrades and their loved ones, on both sides of the front.

One of the most compelling images is a letter from Viktor Shtrum from his Jewish mother, who refused to leave her village even as the Nazis advanced and the Soviet forces had to retreat.  Viktor becomes aware of Nazi atrocities in occupied territory, and he is distraught with anxiety about her fate, but (again, as Chandler makes the reader aware), Grossman, because of anti-semitism under Stalin,  had to be circumspect about what he wrote. But the reader can deduce what happens.   We are told about Shtrum’s mother’s last letter and her stoic resignation.  We are told about its journey from hand to hand.  And we are told how when he finally receives it, Viktor carries the letter about with him wherever he goes, but is unable to talk about it.  This authorial silence about the contents of the letter is more poignant when we learn that these events parallel the fate of Grossman’s own mother.

He felt profoundly guilty about having allowed his mother to stay in Berdichev rather than insisting that he join him and his wife in Moscow.  Her death troubled him for the rest of his life and the last letter from Anna Semyonova — who is clearly a portrait of Grossman’s mother — lies at the centre of Stalingrad like a deep hole. (p.xvi)

In contrast to Anna’s death in the ghetto, which we must imagine, there are also deaths which are swift, merciless and as the battles intensify towards the end of the book, relentless.  Grossman sets a scene, brings a character to life, depicts his thoughts, words and deeds, and while the reader is still absorbing the death of this vividly rendered character, moves on to the next chapter.

These characters are unforgettable.

Lena Gnatyuk tends to the injured in the ruins, pleading with the injured to keep quiet so that the nearby Germans won’t hear them.  In these closing chapters the reader has come to know Lena as Kovalyov’s heart’s desire.  In the bunker they have had a fraught conversation, because he has a girl waiting for him at home, and she, though she loves him, is overwhelmed by her duty to the wounded who need her. They are part of a desperate effort to delay the German capture of the railway station until the reserves arrive, and both know that they are likely to die.

In the next chapter, we see Lena at work among the wounded.  Yakhontov yells in pain, but comforts the young woman who tends to him.

‘You’re good and kind.  Don’t cry, I’ll feel better in a while,’ he said, but the young woman didn’t hear this.  He thought he was pronouncing words, but all she heard was a gurgle.

Lena Gnatyuk did not sleep that night. (p.833)

She reassures a soldier that his two broken legs will be set:

‘It won’t hurt. Be brave.  Be brave until morning.’

In the dawn light, as it went into a dive over the railway station, the nose and wings of the Stuka turned pink.  A high-explosive bomb fell in the pit where Lena Gnatyuk and two orderlies were caring for the wounded.  Every last breath of life was cut short.

A cloud of dust and smoke, reddish brown in the light of the rising sun, hung in the air for a long time.  Then a breeze off the Volga dispersed it over the steppe to the west of the city. (p.834)

Filyashkin is shown as a man of many flaws who rises to the occasion. Despite his wounds, he takes command as the remnants of his men fight off the German artillery.

Filyashkin was issuing commands to himself and then carrying them out himself.  He was, at one and the same time, sub-unit commander, forward observer and machine-gunner.

In his mind, he is not defending himself against a sly, crafty, advancing enemy, he saw himself as the attacker. 

A single simple thought, like an echo from the grinding fire of his machine gun, now took up all Senior Lieutenant Filyashkin’s consciousness. This thought furnished him with an explanation of everything of importance: his success and disappointments, his feeling of condescension to those of his peers who were still mere lieutenants and his envy of those who had already reached the rank of major or lieutenant colonel.  ‘I began as a machine-gunner and I’m ending as a machine-gunner.’ This simple, clear thought was an answer to all that had troubled him during the last few hours.  To machine-gunner Filyashkin, everything bad and painful in his life had ceased to matter.

Shvedkov never managed to bandage Filyashkin’s shoulder with strips of cloth torn off a bathrobe.  Filyashkin suddenly lost consciousness, smashed his chin against the back of the machine gun and fell dead to the ground.  (p.836)

That bathrobe, BTW, was delivered to Lena as a gift from ‘the women of America’.  The parcel was well-meant, but Grossman shows how the pretty clothes and luxury perfume were sent by women who had no idea of the significant role Soviet women played in the war.  Time after time he depicts women who’ve accessed education and training and new opportunities, working as equals in senior management, or as skilled artisans or professionals.  Reading about Lena’s scornful rejection of these frivolous garments reminded me of Svetlana Alexievich’s The Unwomanly Face of War, translated by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky, (1985, see my review).  When Filyashkin warns Lena to take a captured pistol in case she’s captured, just in case, she shrugs and replies: ‘I can shoot myself just as well with my own revolver.’

Filyashkin’s fears for Lena were well-founded. Wikipedia tells us about the rape of about 2 million German women by Soviet soldiers, (and by allied troops though that is mentioned less often) but the rape of five times that number of Soviet women by the Wehrmacht was suppressed during the Cold War both by the Soviets and the West.  Wikipedia tells us that…

… sources estimate that rapes of Soviet women by the Wehrmacht range up to 10,000,000 incidents, with between 750,000 and 1,000,000 children being born as a result. (Wikipedia, War Crimes of the Wehrmacht/Rape, viewed 2/5/24)

In Kovalyov’s last minutes, he remains focussed on the task at hand.  Barely conscious, he takes out his precious notebook of poetry, and pens a report to his superiors.  He hands it to Rysev to deliver, but by the time Rysev reports back that everyone is dead and there’s no one to report to, he was unable to hand the report back.  Kovalyov lay dead, his chest on his kitbag, his hand on his loaded sub-machine gun.  Rysev takes up the gun and the remaining grenades, and pauses to look at his fallen comrade.

He could see a short dark notch on his forehead, between his eyebrows.  The wind was catching his fair hair.  His eyes were half hidden beneath his delicate eyelashes and he was looking sweetly and knowingly down at the ground, smiling at something that he alone knew, that none but he would ever know.

‘Instantaneous  — on the bridge of the nose,’ Rysev said to himself, appalled by death’s swiftness, yet also envious. (p,841)


Mindful of the national conversation we are having about the chilling outbreak of violence against women, I found that my thoughts strayed to a different kind of war when I read  the excerpt below.

Vavilov, an ordinary soldier from an ordinary village is confronted by the destruction of the city and he muses on the vast amount of labour that goes into building a city.  In the ruins, he realises that there is enough broken glass to glaze the windows of every village in Russia. He thinks of the people who once lived there in the ruined city, and those who are entombed, and he realises that for Hitler, strength was a matter of violence — one man’s ability to exercise violence over another. 

And he rejects that…

What we call the soul of the people is determined by a shared understanding of strength, labour, justice and the common good.  When we say, ‘The people will condemn this’, ‘The people will not believe this’ or ‘The people will not agree’, it is this shared understanding that we have in mind.

This shared understanding — these simple and fundamental thoughts and feelings — is present both in the people as a whole and in each individual.  Often only latent, this understanding comes to life when someone feels him- or herself to be united with a larger whole, when someone can say ‘I am the people.’

Those who say that the people worship strength must differentiate between different kinds of strength.  There is a strength that the people respect and admire, and there is a strength that the people will never respect, before which it will never abase itself. (p.779)


And I thought, how apt these words are in our current circumstances.
Though there are all kinds of government actions that need to be taken,
and there needs to be funding to support front-line programs,
there are no simple solutions.
But…
We, the people, need to make our values clear, loud and clear, and assert that
we despise violence.

The ABC news last week featured a snippet about some footballer who’d been suspended for inappropriate behaviour towards women.
He has to do some sort of behavioural change course,
and find a club that will have him if he ever wants to play again.
And then the segment cut to some other footballer who was asked
if it was the end of that player’s career,
and what we heard was the same kind of excuse-making that
teachers hear from parents
whenever we try to discuss a child’s aggressive behaviour.

That was our media at work, undercutting the effort to call out unacceptable behaviour.
The reporter chose to ask that question, the player chose to answer it the way he did, and the editor chose to broadcast it without it being challenged.

Our entertainment industry sabotages our values as well.
All those Hollywood movies that depict violence as a solution to a problem.
All those crime novels and thrillers that portray violence against women
so that some hero can ‘solve the crime’.
But there is rarely any mystery about violence in our society.
Emily Maguire had it right in her 2016 novel An Isolated Incident, see my review.
The murder in that novel was not an isolated incident and in that town everyone knew who had done it and they had turned a blind eye to it.

I think that we, the people, do have a shared understanding that
violence has no place in our society.
We do have a shared understanding that
we do not use it to solve interpersonal problems.
And we will never respect those who abuse strength to inflict harm on others
or make excuses for it.
And we should say so, whenever we see it,
and we should never accept excuse-making.


If you or someone you know is impacted by sexual assault, domestic or family violence,
call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au.
In an emergency, call 000.

Posted by: Lisa Hill | May 4, 2024

2024 WA Premier’s Book Awards shortlists

Thanks to a #HeadsUp from Kim, here are the shortlists for the WA Premier’s Book Awards.

The winners share a prize pool of $120,000 and will be announced on 7 June 2024.

Awards Shortlist:

Cover of A Better PlacePremier’s Prize for Book of the Year, sponsored by Writing WA ($15,000)

  • A Better Place by Stephen Daisley, published by Text Publishing, see my review
  • Cellnight: A verse novel by John Kinsella, published by Transit Lounge, see my thoughts about a Sensational Snippet
  • The Memory of Trees by Viki Cramer, published by Thames & Hudson Australia
  • Operation Hurricane by Paul Grace, published by Hachette Australia
  • What’s for Dinner? by Jill Griffiths, published by Thames & Hudson Australia

Premier’s Prize for an Emerging Writer ($15,000)

  • I am the Mau and other stories by Chemutai Glasheen, published by Fremantle Press
  • The Map of William by Michael Thomas, published by Fremantle Press
  • Old Boy by Georgia Tree, published by Fremantle Press
  • Salt River Road by Molly Schmidt, published by Fremantle Press
  • The Things We Live With by Gemma Nisbet, published by Upswell Publishing

Premier’s Prize for Children’s Book of the Year ($15,000)

  • City of Light, written by Julia Lawrinson, illustrated by Heather Potter and Mark Jackson, published by Wild Dog Books
  • The Eerie Excavation: An Alice England Mystery by Ash Harrier, published by Pantera Press
  • A Friend for George, written and illustrated by Gabriel Evans, published by Puffin, an imprint of Penguin Random House Australia
  • Our Country: Where History Happened, written by Mark Greenwood and illustrated by Frané Lessac, published by Walker Books Australia
  • Scout and the Rescue Dogs by Dianne Wolfer, published by Walker Books Australia

Daisy Utemorrah Award for Unpublished Indigenous Junior and Young Adult Fiction, sponsored by Magabala Books ($15,000 and a publishing contract with Magabala Books)

  • Dr Stephen Hagan – Acacia: 6 Eyes on Yesterday
  • Maureen Glover – Brothers in Arms
  • Elise Thornthwaite – Underneath the Surface
  • Marly and Linda Wells – Dusty Tracks

Western Australian Writer’s Fellowship ($60,000)

  • Lucy Dougan
  • Alan Fyfe
  • Kylie Howarth
  • Laurie Steed
  • Emma Young

Congratulations to all the authors, editors and publishers!

For more information, see the awards website.

BTW It’s a just a short while since I received an email invitation to contribute feedback about the allocation of money across the categories.  I can’t remember what I suggested but I found it extremely hard to do because it’s such a miserly amount of money for a very wealthy state.  Where are the prizes sponsored by WA universities and corporates, eh?

Posted by: Lisa Hill | May 4, 2024

Six Degrees of Separation: from The Anniversary…

This month’s #6Degrees, hosted by Kate from Books are my Favourite and Best starts with our own bookshelves.  We start with The Anniversary by Stephanie Bishop…

I’ll start with the easiest of segues, with the second novel of the same author, The Other Side of the World. (2015, see my review.) It was one of a crop of #MiserableMigrant stories but the writing was exceptionally good and…

…it reminded me of Ian McEwan’s On Chesil Beach (2007) in the way that the small domestic tragedy derives from the failure of the characters to communicate with each other.  How my heart ached for those newlyweds! See my uncharacteristically brief review here, and there’s a summary of it at Wikipedia, if you’re not bothered about spoilers.  Shortlisted for the Booker, On Chesil Beach generated controversy because it’s a novella, (and didn’t win) but it became one of those interesting books described as Marmite Books/Vegemite Books: you either love them or you hate them, there is no middle ground.

On Chesil Beach is the ultimate #MiserableMarriage story, IMO.  The #MiserableMarriages tag at His Futile Preoccupations is always entertaining because Guy has a droll style when forensically analysing books in this category, and he recently reviewed Soon by Charlotte Grimshaw which was of immediate interest to me because Theresa Smith and I are hosting #AYearOfNZLit. I’ve read four Kiwi authors so far this year, the most recent being Decline and Fall on Savage Street (2017), by Fiona Farrell. And next up…

… for May, I have The Necessary Angel by C K Stead on my desk, ready to start as soon as I deal with other pressing bookish priorities.  C K Stead is one of New Zealand’s most notable authors but up to now I have only read his novel Mansfield. (2004, see my not very impressed review) and I also have his The Death of the Body on the TBR.   I am hoping that I will get on better with The Necessary Angel. It might also qualify for Guy’s #MiserableMarriages tag because Goodreads tells me that:

It can be read on many levels – as a story of people grappling with love and fidelity; as a story about the importance of books in everyday life; as a commentary on living in complex modern-day Europe; and as a page-turning mystery.

Plus, it’s set at the Sorbonne, and I do like a campus novel!

However, I admit to being a bit put off by that clichéd cover, which features the back of a woman, à la Shutterstock, though this one is from Trevillion Images.  Still, at least the woman on the cover of The Necessary Angel has a body, Sorry by Gail Jones (on my TBR) lacks a head and legs, and …

… the cover of Sara Thornhill by Kate Grenville (2011, see my review) is one of many lazy designs that feature just the back of a head.

Ok, rant over, time to attack my Latin homework in time for Monday, and when that’s done I have a review of Vasily Grossman’s Stalingrad to finish, plus my thoughts from an author talk I recently attended!

That’s my #6Degrees for this month!

Next month (June 2024), starts with “a crime novel with difference” – Butter by Asako Yuzuki.

Posted by: Lisa Hill | May 3, 2024

2024 NSW Premier’s Literary Awards Shortlists

The 2024 NSW Premier’s Awards shortlist have been announced.  I haven’t read many but can certainly recommend the two that I have.

Christina Stead Prize for Fiction ($40,000)

• The Sun Walks Down by Fiona McFarlane (Allen & Unwin), see Brona’s review
• Prima Facie by Suzie Miller (Pan Macmillan Australia)
• The Sitter by Angela O’Keeffe (UQP), see my review
• Shirley by Ronnie Scott (Penguin Random House Australia), see Kim’s review at Reading Matters
• The Crying Room by Gretchen Shirm (Transit Lounge), see my review
• Praiseworthy by Alexis Wright (Giramondo Publishing), see combined reviews here

Douglas Stewart Prize for Non-fiction ($40,000)

• Childhood by Shannon Burns (Text Publishing)
• Ghosts of the Orphanage: A Story of Mysterious Deaths, A Conspiracy of Silence, and a Search for Justice by Christine Kenneally (Hachette Australia)
• Here Be Monsters: Is Technology Reducing Our Humanity? by Richard King (Monash University Publishing)
• Our Concealed Ballast by Marian Macken (Vagabond Press)
• Personal Score: Sport, Culture, Identity by Ellen van Neerven (UQP)
• The God of No Good by Sita Walker (Ultimo Press)

Kenneth Slessor Prize for Poetry ($30,000)

• Hunger and Predation by Pooja Mittal Biswas (Cordite Publishing)
• Moon Wrasse by Willo Drummond (Puncher & Wattmann)
• Burn by Libby Hart (Lepus Print)
• Spore or Seed by Caitlin Maling (Fremantle Press)
• Non-Essential Work by Omar Sakr (UQP)
• Riverbed Sky Songs by Tais Rose Wae (Vagabond Press)
Highly Commended
• Like to the Lark by Stuart Barnes (Upswell Publishing)
• I Saw the Best Memes of My Generation by Dominic Symes (Recent Work Press)

Patricia Wrightson Prize for Children’s Literature ($30,000)

• Leaf-light by Trace Balla (Allen & Unwin Children’s Publishing)
• Picasso and the Greatest Show on Earth by Anna Fienberg (Allen & Unwin Children’s Publishing)
• The Raven’s Song by Zana Fraillon and Bren MacDibble (Allen & Unwin Children’s Publishing)
• Songlines: First Knowledges for younger readers by Margo Neale, Lynne Kelly and illustrated by Blak Douglas (Thames & Hudson Australia)
• Paradise Sands: A Story of Enchantment by Levi Pinfold (Walker Books Australia)
• Australia: Country of Colour by Jess Racklyeft (Affirm Press)

Ethel Turner Prize for Young People’s Literature ($30,000)

• Royals by Tegan Bennett Daylight (Simon & Schuster Australia)
• Grace Notes by Karen Comer (Hachette Australia)
• The Quiet and the Loud by Helena Fox (Pan Macmillan Australia)
• We Could Be Something by Will Kostakis (Allen & Unwin Children’s Publishing)
• We Didn’t Think It Through by Gary Lonesborough (Allen & Unwin Children’s Publishing)
• Selfie by Allayne L. Webster (Text Publishing)

Nick Enright Prize for Playwriting ($30,000)

• Telethon Kid by Alistair Baldwin (Malthouse Theatre)
• don’t ask what the bird look like by Hannah Belanszky (Queensland Theatre)
• Sex Magick by Nicholas Brown (Griffin Theatre Company & Currency Press)
• Unprecedented by Campion Decent (HotHouse Theatre)
• RBG: Of Many, One by Suzie Miller (Sydney Theatre Company & Currency Press)
• Blue by Thomas Weatherall (Belvoir St Theatre)

Betty Roland Prize for Scriptwriting ($30,000)

• Safe Home, Episode 1 by Anna Barnes (Kindling Pictures)
• The Giants by Laurence Billiet and Rachael Antony(General Strike & Matchbox Pictures)
• Late Night with the Devil by Colin Cairnes and Cameron Cairnes (Future Pictures)
• Poor Things by Tony McNamara (Searchlight Pictures & Element Pictures)
• Shayda by Noora Niasari (Origma 45, Dirty Films & Parandeh Pictures)
• The New Boy by Warwick Thornton (Dirty Films & Scarlett Pictures)
Highly Commended
The Lost Flowers of Alice Hart, Episode 1, ‘Black Fire Orchid’ by Sarah Lambert (Made Up Stories & Amazon Prime)

Indigenous Writers’ Prize ($30,000)

• Close to the Subject: Selected Works by Daniel Browning (Magabala Books)
• She is the Earth by Ali Cobby Eckermann (Magabala Books)
• We Didn’t Think It Through by Gary Lonesborough (Allen & Unwin Children’s Publishing)
• Firelight by John Morrissey (Text Publishing)
• Personal Score: Sport, Culture, Identity by Ellen van Neerven (UQP)
• Praiseworthy by Alexis Wright (Giramondo Publishing)

Multicultural NSW Award ($30,000 — sponsored by Multicultural NSW)

• Anam by André Dao (Penguin Random House Australia), see Brona’s review
• The Shape of Dust: A father wrongly imprisoned. A daughter’s quest to free him by Lamisse Hamouda (Pantera Press)
• Stay for Dinner by Sandhya Parappukkaran, illustrated by Michelle Pereira (Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing)
• God Forgets About the Poor by Peter Polites (Ultimo Press), on my TBR
• Non-Essential Work by Omar Sakr (UQP)
• Songs for the Dead and the Living by Sara M Saleh (Affirm Press)

UTS Glenda Adams Award for New Writing ($10,000 — sponsored by the University of Technology, Sydney)

• Elegy for an Elephant by Ryan Abramowitz (Narratives of Nature)
• the body country by Susie Anderson (Hachette Australia)
• don’t ask what the bird look like by Hannah Belanszky (Queensland Theatre)
• You’ll Never Find Me by Indianna Bell (Stakeout Films)
• Childhood by Shannon Burns (Text Publishing)
• Grace Notes by Karen Comer (Hachette Australia)
• Anam by André Dao (Penguin Random House Australia), see Brona’s review
• as good a woman as ever broke bread by Alex McInnis (Puncher & Wattmann)
• Firelight by John Morrissey (Text Publishing)

The University of Sydney People’s Choice Award ($5,000 — sponsored by the University of Sydney)

• The Sun Walks Down by Fiona McFarlane (Allen & Unwin), see Brona’s review
• Prima Facie by Suzie Miller (Pan Macmillan Australia)
• The Sitter by Angela O’Keeffe (UQP), see my review
• Shirley by Ronnie Scott (Penguin Random House Australia)
• The Crying Room by Gretchen Shirm (Transit Lounge), see my review
• Praiseworthy by Alexis Wright (Giramondo Publishing)
• Childhood by Shannon Burns (Text Publishing)
• Ghosts of the Orphanage: A Story of Mysterious Deaths, A Conspiracy of Silence, and a Search for Justice by Christine Kenneally (Hachette Australia)
• Here Be Monsters: Is Technology Reducing Our Humanity? by Richard King (Monash University Publishing)
• Our Concealed Ballast by Marian Macken (Vagabond Press)
• Personal Score: Sport, Culture, Identity by Ellen van Neerven (UQP)
• The God of No Good by Sita Walker (Ultimo Press)

Congratulations to all the authors, editors and publishers!

Many thanks to the publicist for the #NSWPLA who makes it easy to do a quick post about the shortlists!

Posted by: Lisa Hill | May 3, 2024

Angel, (1957) by Elizabeth Taylor

The blurb on my 2017 Virago reissue of Angel (1957) by the English novelist Elizabeth Taylor (1912-1975) includes a comment about Taylor by Sarah Waters: an author of great subtlety, great compassion and great depth.  But I don’t agree.  Angel is a brutal take-down of working-class aspiration, and while it’s amusing for a while, at 300+ pages it’s too long for itself and the joke.  I only persisted with it because I had got the impression from somewhere that Elizabeth Not-The-Actress Taylor was an author worth reading.  Wikipedia tells us that:

Kingsley Amis described her as “one of the best English novelists born in this century”. Antonia Fraser called her “one of the most underrated writers of the 20th century”, while Hilary Mantel said she was “deft, accomplished and somewhat underrated.”

So I am out on a limb here, and wondering if it’s my Bolshie Australian attitudes that put me out of step with critical opinion. We do class consciousness here too, of course, and I am looking forward to reading Love Across Class, a new book by Eve Vincent and Rose Butler, from Melbourne University Press, which has the merit of acknowledging the myth of egalitarianism in Australia. But here we lack the fine gradings and disdain for the ‘nouveau riche’ of 20th century British class consciousness, and here it’s about the school you went to, your postcode, and in some quarters, your religion or your clothing labels.  What the working class protagonist of Elizabeth Taylor’s Angel does not understand is that she can never transcend her background and especially not by making money.  Taylor’s Angel is not trapped there because has an uneducated mind and spectacular ignorance and she refuses to learn, it is because in Britain class was immutable.  Perhaps it still is.

Not expecting to dislike the book, I went looking for autobiographical information to explain its spiteful class consciousness.  Elizabeth Taylor’s background could perhaps be described as ‘aspirational lower middle class’.  Wikipedia tells us that her father was an insurance inspector, and she went to a private selective day school for girls. She worked as a governess (where like Aunt Lottie in the novel) she could observe her ‘betters’ close up, and later as a tutor and librarian. She married into capital with a husband who owned a confectionery company, flirted with the communist party, and then supported the Labour Party.

#Digression: Here I am reminded of a very wealthy friend and Australian Labor Party supporter who said to me once (from the mansion which boasted an Olympic swimming pool and a tennis court) ‘Of course I’m in favour of wealth redistribution… unless they redistribute some of mine’.  I still liked her, very much.

At 15, Angel’s protagonist looks upon the dreariness of her home in Volunteer Road in Norley and decides to be a writer.  Her Aunt Lottie, in service at Paradise House, has helped towards the school fees at a private school where Angel has learned nothing but the pretensions that will guide her life.  With astonishing determination, Angel disappears into her room and writes a novel of such awfulness that it is immediately rejected by the publishers she sends it to.  But satirising gimcrack commercial fiction  and the cynical publishers who know such books are rubbish but publish anyway for profit, Taylor has Angel finding a sympathetic mentor in Theo Gilbright, who recognises the florid style of romantic Victorian or Edwardian authors, and against the scorn of his partners, thinks it will sell. In a particular market i.e. not the literary one.

Puzzlingly, Theo is sympathetically portrayed as compassionate and too timid to tell Angel the truth.  He deludes himself into thinking that he might be able to tame Angel’s excesses, but fails to do so over the course of her career.  She churns out one dreadful bestseller after another, refusing all advice.  She ventures into settings she has never seen and knows nothing about (Italy, Greece) but when she has become rich enough to buy Paradise House, Angel — influenced by a nouveau riche American neighbour who uses ’causes’ to gain approval— diversifies into polemics about vegetarianism and associated eccentricities, which coincides with a decline in her readership (and her income).  (I’m guessing that vegetarianism was eccentric in 1950s Britain, and from my childhood memories of how they cooked vegetables, perhaps this was justified.)

Unwisely, Angel marries a wastrel called Esmé because she is captive to her romantic dreams, but although WW1 fails to kill him, he dies young so that she can memorialise her ‘perfect marriage’.  She is lucky that she has a loyal, devoted and nauseatingly humble fan in the form of Esmé’s sister Nora who manages the household and (unnecessarily) nurtures Angel’s ego.  Nora reminds me of dogsbody Ida Baker a.k.a. L.M. on whom Katherine Mansfield depended but also despised.  (See my review of Katherine Mansfield, the Storyteller by Kathleen Jones, but, alas, though I remember her vividly from a book I read 14 years ago, I see now that in my review I wrote too little about Ida who was heroic in her devotion).

Angel, wearing ghastly clothes from her decaying wardrobe, spends her decline as a sort of Miss Havisham amid cobwebs and mould, as Paradise House crumbles around her.

Other reviewers, and Hilary Mantel in the Introduction, see this book as Taylor’s urge to de-romanticise writing, to show that nobody ever went broke underestimating public taste.  And Wikipedia tells me that:

Taylor’s work is mainly concerned with the nuances of everyday life and situations. Her shrewd but affectionate portrayals of middle-class and upper middle-class English life won her an audience of discriminating readers, as well as loyal friends in the world of letters.

I’d be interested to know how popular she was with less ‘discriminating’ readers…

Author: Elizabeth Taylor
Title: Angel
Introduction by Hilary Mantel
Cover illustration by Sarah Maycock
Publisher: Virago Modern Classics, 2017
ISBN: 9781844083077, pbk., 316 pages
Source: personal copy, purchased from Brotherhood Books

 

The Stella Prize is due to be announced tomorrow, but today I had the opportunity to listen to one of the shortlisted authors in conversation, courtesy of the Melbourne Jewish Book Week Writing Lives series.

This is the description of the event:

Katia Ariel discusses her 2024 Stella shortlisted sensation, ‘The Swift Dark Tide’, in conversation with playwright and theatre producer, Jessica Bellamy. Ariel’s memoir deftly oscillates between journal entry and reminiscences of a childhood in Odessa, emigration to Australia, a happy family life, and the urgency and turmoil of a same-sex love affair. The depth and honesty of this ‘Writing Lives’ is both disarming and profound.

And this is a description of the book:

What happens when, in the middle of a happy heterosexual marriage, a woman falls in love with another woman?
The Swift Dark Tide is a story of selfhood and desire, of careful listening to an ungovernable heart.
Part memoir, part love letter, The Swift Dark Tide is also a chronicle of life by the sea, journeying between Melbourne’s St Kilda and the Black Sea town of Odessa. Katia Ariel introduces us to a lineage of soulful, strident women and beautifully nuanced men. She invites us into home and heart to witness love, loss and joy, motherhood, daughterhood and the urgent wildness of the body.

The conversation began with Katia talking about language and stories as a key part of her childhood life, and how she then ‘shut it underground’ in adolescence during the period of her migration to Australia aged 10, learning a new language and adjusting her identity.  She didn’t start writing again until she was in her 30s, with falling in love with another woman as a catalyst.  Now she loves writing and wants to do it all the time!

Jessica asked about the influences on her writing, and Katia responded by saying that she is culturally omnivorous, consuming all kinds of books, art, music and food from a variety of cultures.  She is observant of other creatives and that inspires her.

The book, being a memoir that explores romance, eroticism, joys and sorrows, involves the common contradiction… it traverses secrecy and privacy in a form that is, inevitably, revealing.  Bring vulnerable and open, Katia thinks that telling the truth ‘faster’ is best.  So, because her memoir involves her children, the father of her children, the woman she loves and many other people who matter to her, she read everything to them beforehand, and has their permission to put it in the book.  But she could also write freely about herself and her body without seeking permission.  She is hopeful that the result can be ‘unshaming’ for other women who are like herself.

Some elements, for example about the decision to have an open marriage and some unusual aspects of her child’s birth, have generated different reactions, but she wanted to be honest.  She also wanted to be honest in discussing the mother-daughter relationship.  Her options were to ‘offer comfort’ or for them to ‘free themselves’ but her own ‘becoming’ meant individuating away from her mother.  They have a lot in common and have always been very close — and still are — but she felt that motherhood i.e. being ‘someone else’s parent’ meant that they needed to ‘let go’.  To let the new person arrive, the new person that was Katia, and the new child.

They talked a little about Soviet Jews, and how they have a unique experience and identity i.e. Jewish-pagan-communist-atheist.  Katia called it a ‘cellular’ inheritance, and this reminded me of my recent reading of Anne Berest’s The Postcard, in which she wrote about how — in contemporary France — a Jewish identity is conferred by others, even on secular Jews who are not observant in any way and who never really identify as Jews.  Berest recounted having a relationship with a Jewish man who thought she was ‘hiding’ her Jewish identity because she hadn’t mentioned it… but it just hadn’t occurred to her to do that.

In the context of discussion about ‘coming out’ in later life, there was the question of: what do we owe those in the past who could not do what we can? Katia feels that any answer can only be speculation, because we cannot know what our ancestors wanted of us. All you can do is engage with the ancestors who you know, and her immediate ancestors just want her to be happy.  To be herself.

The talk concluded with a reading from the book, which is in the form of vignettes from a diary, covering the three years in which her new love changes her life and her concept of self.

The long- and short-listed books can be seen here.

Posted by: Lisa Hill | April 30, 2024

Temperance, (2024) by Carol Lefevre

Carol Lefevre is a versatile writer… Murmurations (2020) shortlisted for the NSW Premier’s Literary Awards — was a delicate, melancholy collection of interlinked stories — about a generation of women whose lives were constrained by the mores of the time and the isolation of urban life.  The Tower (2022) was a dazzling composite novel featuring a couple of feisty older women determined to live out their last years on their own terms.  But while Lefevre’s new novel Temperance is more conventional in form, it has a darker tone and a narrative arc that gathers tempo towards the unexpected ending.  It is a novel of a childhood blighted by the poverty of single-parenthood and the otherness that poverty brings but it is also a novel of friendship and love between two older women.  And it is an unflinching novel of parenting and the terrible, damaging mistakes people can make, from unresolved grief, from blatant selfishness, from misplaced hope and from a long-held lack of confidence in personal worth.

It is also a novel of betrayal.  Shocking, breath-taking betrayal.

The story begins in 1963, with the chance friendship of an unconventional artist called Mardi Rose and café owner Stella Madigan, who supports her three children, Tess, Fran and little Theo, who was born shortly after his father’s accident.  This accident is never spoken of, but Fran, from whose perspective the story is told, has found newspaper clippings about it among old photographs.

This morning Fran sees with a shiver that the newsprint is yellowing and brittle.  She holds each one by the edges and lays them out on the floorboards.  In her favourite picture their father is wearing shorts and a singlet, with his socks folded down over scuffed boots.  It is his cheeky lopsided grin she loves the most.  Frank Madigan squints into slanting sunlight, and Fran wonders who he was looking at — perhaps Stella took the picture.  The truck he stands beside is the one that plunged from a bridge into the flood-swollen Darling River.  (p.12)

He’d picked up a passenger, spent time with him at the pub, and failed to see the warning signs on the bridge.

Frank’s truck smashed through the barricades, and out in the middle a wheel went down, and the load jack-knifed.  One clipping says the vehicle went over the side.  Another describes how the bridge dropped the truck and its load of wool bales into the rust-coloured water. (p.12)

The hitchhiker’s body was found downstream, but though police divers scoured the river, Frank’s body was never found.  Tess and Fran are convinced that the signs were never there; Tess who was older and remembers everything says he would have seen them even if he was drunk because he wasn’t stupid…

Stella, whose visible scars on her work-roughened hands are from the hot oil in the fryer, bears her emotional scars within.  Her exhaustion gives her scant time or energy for mothering, and it is Tess to whom Theo turns when he has his frequent nightmares. Fran doesn’t have anybody.  Unlike her siblings who are attractive and charming, and who eventually find partners who love them, Fran drifts through life in a fog of unhappiness, yearning for the kind of family life that other people seem to have.  She marries, unwisely, to become a mother to a waif called Lauris, only to have that love rejected when cruel adolescence rears its head and Lauris seeks out her feckless birth-mother.

Mardi Rose is the light that shines through this melancholy tale.  She brings colour and laughter and a liberating breath of fresh air into the bleak world of this family, but when her friendship with Stella becomes something more, there’s a bit of a scandal about that in those conservative days in beachside Adelaide.  Byron Bay was then the mecca for alternative lifestyles and much to her children’s surprise Stella agrees to pack up everything and take off for a new life.  Tess, at sixteen, refuses to come along, so it is only Fran and Theo who witness the event that was to change everything.  They were asleep in a tent in the camping ground at the small town of Temperance when disaster struck and they were too young to make sense of anything.  Stella, who turns around in a panic and returns without Mardi Rose to the dreariness of the café, will never talk about it with her children.  It is an unspoken mystery that haunts them for decades afterwards.

The novel gathers momentum when Theo and Fran return to Temperance in adulthood, and it becomes unputdownable.

Highly recommended.

Author: Carol Lefevre
Title: Temperance
Publisher: Wakefield Press, 2024
Cover design by Wakefield Press
Cover art: Beach Scene  c1932, by Clarice Beckett
ISBN: 9781743058695, pbk.,326 pages
Review copy courtesy of Wakefield Press

 

I’m making steady progress with reading Strange Paths, Matthew Lamb’s new biography of Frank Moorhouse — which has as a bonus excerpts from Frank’s youthful poetry.

Youthful poetry is mostly adolescent angst, and if mine was anything to go by, it’s a good thing that most of it never sees the light of day.  But some of Frank’s poetry has stood the test of time.

This one comes from the time when his girlfriend Wendy turned out not to be pregnant, and it shows the tension between being fond of his girl and the desire to be in control of his life:

she said she was a little relieved
but sorry in another way
because it would have meant marriage
i felt relieved
but not very sorry
being a person who likes to decide when i am going to do things
having been pushed around my circumstance
quite a bit
now i have a job in the country
which i applied for when we thought wendy was
and it looks as if circumstance will push me into. (p.146)

When Frank was still a junior reporter, he was called home to Nowra because his father’s business was in trouble.  It’s a pointer to the way he lived his life, without ever owning property or amassing wealth:

it seems
that there is one thing
far stronger than the family
and that is
the business
it shows that the family
is somehow built on the business
and it is shameful
that so much importance
should be placed
on the making and spending
of money (p.144)

The last line of this one raises a smile, until one thinks of all the other hopefuls who never found a way to realise their dreams.

On the first night, he sat at his old desk, just as he had done during his high-school years, the desk at which he’d taught himself to type, writing his first short stories and essays.

is my writing
worth the time
and the concentration?
have i a place
in the world of writing?
here i sit at my old school desk
where i wrote many
to-be-world-shattering short stories
which lie in the folders
marked
1954
1955
carefully preserved to assist
those who want
my old work
when i am famous (p.147)

This one, at a time when we are all thinking about forms of masculinity which have led to the tragic deaths of too many women this year, isn’t just about male drinking culture, but also about acquiescing into toxic behaviour:

Frank arrived in Wagga on Christmas Eve, moving into a room at the Pastoral Hotel.  He stopped by the newsroom, where he met the editor, Eric Irwin, and the chief of staff, a woman named Alex Garner.  By Boxing Day he had already hit a low point.  ‘I felt like quitting today.’ he wrote in his journal.

But over the next week he wrote a few news stories and ‘friendly-met’ a few people.  He worried about falling back on old habits.  ‘I’ve met two reporters and both are alcoholics,’ he wrote to Wendy.  ‘Thought I could get away from drinking…’ On 30 December, in the final entry of his writing journal before he abandoned it for good, he wrote:

i realised today that i have been drinking
to become accepted by the group
i drank all night
and did not collapse
and the group recognised me
and i am now invited to their parties
and am treated as a friend
and can joke about drinking sessions
and hangovers
but i did not enjoy the drinking so very much
i had to drink to become accepted. (pp.152-3)


More to come later…

Author: Matthew Lamb
Title: Frank Moorhouse: Strange Paths
Publisher: Knopf (an imprint of Penguin Random House), 2023
Cover design: Adam Laszczuk
ISBN: 9780143786122, hbk., 462 pages including An Author’s Note, Sources, and Acknowledgements.  (The Index will be in Volume 2.)
Review copy courtesy of Penguin Random House

Posted by: Lisa Hill | April 28, 2024

2024 Sorrento Writers Festival (27/4/24)

It’s Sunday morning in Sorrento and I am hastily journalling yesterday’s events before we depart our accommodation for breakfast somewhere. Sorrento Lodge is a strange setup… very modern, very clean, comfy beds, but a-hem very cosy, and minimalist.  No hair dryer.  No shampoo.  (But two TVs.  How does that work?) No kettle in the room, or cups for a pre-breakfast cuppa.  Kitchen facilities at the end of the corridor are shared and not a pretty sight in the morning. And though they have a curfew of 10pm for the comfort of other guests, it is most certainly not observed or enforced, not even after midnight.

Which is why I was so tired yesterday that I abandoned my third session to come back and sleep the afternoon away.

Update, at home later on Sunday: I looked up reviews of Sorrento Lodge, and discovered that our discomforts, which were admittedly minimal, were entirely our fault.  In error, we had booked a place that is meant for employees, i.e. inexpensive, self-catering, bring most of your own gear.  It’s for the army of hospo staff who turn up for the holiday season and weekends, and it actually says in its FAQs that it’s not meant for holidaymakers or weekend stays.   #meaCulpa…

Edited 29/4/24 to add information about panellists and links to my review of their books.


My first session was terrific.  It was called Unpacking Australian Literature, and though it didn’t do that because the moderator’s questions went elsewhere, it was very interesting.

The panel consisted of Tony Birch, Jock Serong and Charlotte Wood, with Sarah L’Estrange as panel chair.

  • Tony Birch was the first Dr Bruce McGuiness Indigenous Research Fellowship in 2015, and is the award-winning author of five novels, five short fiction collections and two poetry books.  I profiled him in Meet an Aussie Author: Tony Birch way back in 2012, and I’ve read and reviewed Blood (2011),  Ghost River (2015),  Common People (2017),  and (my favourite) The White Girl (2019).  (I have Dark as Last Night (2021); Father’s Day (2009) and Women and Children (2023) on the TBR, and I will soon have a copy of his monograph on Kim Scott from Black Inc’s Writers on Writers series).

Tony Birch talked about his childhood in inner city Melbourne.  He told a lovely story about the first time he saw the sea, and it reminded me of the late Peter Cundall of Gardening Australia fame talking about the first time he went into a library, got sent home to wash his hands, and then came back to enter what he thought was heaven.  Birch reminded us that inner city housing doesn’t have backyards big enough to play ball games, so the street was where the kids played cricket and footy.

Asked why he was drawn to writing about children in his fiction, Birch said that childhood is formative for everyone and is often related to the places we love, especially in a childhood like his where the kids got away from their parents and were allowed to do their own thing.

Charlotte Wood grew up on the Monaro (and told us how to pronounce it, not like the car).  South of Canberra, it’s a bare landscape but she had a childhood full of freedom, roaming around on bikes, free to do whatever she wanted.  There were bigger families then, so she always had someone to play with.  And children had privacy, and a private world.

Food for thought, eh?

Jock Serong talked about writing.  When we read, (in English, that is) he said, we  read L to R, up to down.  But when writing, it happens in a spiral, bringing parts together and moving them apart.  So what is the role of Australian literature in questioning the narratives we tell ourselves?

Birch talked about his recent book which is about Kim Scott, in the Black Inc Writers on Writers series.  He talked about challenging existing narratives but in an open and inclusive way.  Kim Scott asks us to understand Australian history in a different way, and to open up the discussion.  His writing is provocative, but it’s a gentle challenge.

Birch’s prize winning book The White Girl is about the Stolen Generations made accessible to readers who are inevitably going to be mostly white. The White Girl is a love story and it’s about the universal love within families. (See my review).

The book, he said, has had a good after life, it’s taught at Year 11 to engage young people.  Birch says he doesn’t want to write alienating stories,  and he wants to write about Aboriginal women who have agency.  There is domestic violence but it’s off stage, and the reader sees an act of love instead: Ruby washing her auntie’s wounds after an assault.

I caught a glimpse of Jock Serong’s latest book but it’s not in the shops yet so he talked about his trilogy.  (See my reviews of the ). He recapped the activities of George Augustus Robinson, and says that fiction can pay respect to indigenous people when history (i.e. Robinson’s diary) doesn’t.  And fiction has staying power.  We know what we know of the Elizabethan era from Shakespeare not from history books!

The topic moved on to ‘writing from a sense of rage’ which brought up Charlotte Wood’s The Natural Way of Things, but though she said rage was a fuel for the book, she didn’t want to stay there.  It was quite interesting the way that the moderator Sarah L’Estrange wanted to explore rage (by which I think she meant women’s rage) and the writers didn’t.  Birch, who by any estimation had a rough childhood, said he wasn’t traumatised by it, and though he doesn’t want his grandchildren to witness what he did, his demeanour — and his books that I’ve read — are testament to that.  He wants to write about men who are ok.

This was a most enjoyable session, but there were questions I wanted these writers to explore.  Why do Australian authors write so much about old wars, crime and selective bits of history?  Why don’t they write about class, for example?


My next session was Gail Jones in conversation with Fiona Gruber.  Jones is an academic and the author of ten novels.  I regret that I did not get on with her earlier works, but I kept on buying her books one after the other because I knew I would want to read them one day.  I began with Our Shadows (2020); then I read and loved the award-winning Salonika Burning (2022), then The Death of Noah Glass (2018), and now her most recent novel One Another (2024). Others waiting patiently on the TBR are A Guide to Berlin (2015), Combined Reviews and Five Bells (2011).

Fiona was brilliant at asking an open-ended question and just letting Gail talk.  She talked about the circuitous way that One Another (see my review) was sparked by seeing the wreck of Joseph Conrad’s boat, the invasion of Ukraine and her memories of feeling dissonance when in the UK where everyone was obsessed with Princess Di and Thatcher but in Australia there was Mabo which was momentous.

*chuckle* And she wanted her story to have characters who didn’t have Google and mobile phones!

There was an interesting diversion into talking about literary criticism.  I was so interested, I took only scrappy notes, but the gist of it was, that criticism now focusses on identity and emoting and placing the self into the text.

#NoteToSelf: Don’t do it!!

The conversation moved on to journeys, and the characters in One Another floundering and feeling out of place.  Joseph Conrad’s life was endlessly journeying, from his childhood through to his voyages, so it was a life where he was always ‘out of place’ even when he finally settled in the UK because his thick accent placed him always as an outsider.

Jones’ novel is structured in these waves of events, it’s not chronological  because she wanted to write about why we become so interested in the people whose books we read.  She picks up on moments of intensification, and symbolic moments. So no, she’s not a planner.  She has an image, and a sort of concept, and she writes intuitively.

She’s interested in words — what they can and can’t do, and images likewise — what they can and can’t do.

There was an audible intake of breath when she told us how quickly she writes her books, but that writing comes after a very long time of thinking and composing mentally.

Oh, and just at the end, she said a very interesting thing: she thinks that though we talk about postmodernism, most of us are modernists. We believe in deep time, and in symbols, and we read to complicate ourselves.

I wanted to know more about that, but it was time to move on.


My next session was The Life and Legacy of Miles Franklin, featuring Kgshak Akec, Amy Brown, Monique di Mattina, Clare Wright and Fiona Sweet.  It was lovely to hear Kgshak Akec in the flesh, and she had a brief moment to talk about how being nominated for the MF for her 2022 debut novel Hopeless Kingdom (see my review) had changed her life, but the chair was head honcho of the Stella Prize and it was more of a Stella Prize love-in than I was interested in. I was so very, very tired that I shot through and spent the afternoon asleep in bed.  Sorrento Lodge is quiet as the grave in mid-afternoon.  It’s only at night that you can’t get any sleep…


So that’s it, for the 2024 Sorrento Writers Festival.  Congratulations to everyone involved, especially the volunteers without whom it would not happen.  The hospo folks were marvellous too, they were run off their feet with the festival coinciding with a long weekend, but the service was always friendly and professional and if things went awry they were quick to apologise.

PS The Spouse went to lots of interesting NF sessions and I will try to pick his brains on the journey home so that I can add in some of his thoughts too.

Time to pack up now, will chat in comments when I get home!

Posted by: Lisa Hill | April 26, 2024

2024 Sorrento Writers Festival (26/4/24)

Greetings from Sorrento, where I have had a lovely day listening to some very interesting sessions!

This has to be quick, we are booked in for an early dinner at The Baths, and I am starving because there was no time for lunch… so these are just quick summaries, sorry!

(I will fix up misspellings of authors names or those whose names I didn’t catch… later. And I will add in the names of the authors’ books too. )

Update 29/4/24 Edited to add extra details.


First up, I went to the second of three sessions on Modernism.  (I missed the first one which was yesterday.)  This one was about how modernism changed architecture, and the speakers were Fiona Austin of Beaumaris Modern Fame; Leonie Gruber, Greer Honeywill and Patricia Callan.

Fiona Austin is the author of Beaumaris Modern, (2018) which I wrote about here after I went to the launch; Dr Greer Honeywill is a multi-disciplinary artist, researcher and curator;  Patricia Callan is the founder of Modernist Australia and the author of The New Modernist House; and Fiona Gruber writes on arts and culture and is an ABC radio arts presenter.

Modernism, as we know, is a movement that began in Europe in the early C20th century, most notably by the Bauhaus in 1919, and is became influential in a very short time but Australia was late to the party for various reasons and nothing very exciting happened in architecture here until the postwar era.  That is when we began to see the whole point of architecture, which is to make life better.

Domestic housing is made better by having light-filled spaces, by building the house to the orientation of the sun, by the use of local materials, by integrating the outside with interior spaces, by designing free-flowing spaces and by the use of colour.  The speakers were adamant that making houses bigger does not make them better, and nor does the current fad for beige, beige and more beige because people always have an eye on resale value now.

There were slides of some lovely modernist houses, especially in Beaumaris which is where in the postwar period artists and architects formed a mecca for creativity.  The houses were modest because there was a shortage of materials and tradesmen, but they worked well, and today, updated with modern appliances etc, they still do.

Modernist houses, they said, were great for women, because kitchens were no longer isolated from the rest of the house.   (LH: Of course, it’s even better if she gets out of the kitchen because others are sharing the cooking but that was a topic for another day.)

Not all modernist houses can be preserved with heritage listings, but if more people valued them, they would get updated instead of building some horrible monstrosity instead.  (They didn’t use the word monstrosity, that’s my word.)


My next session was Modernism #3, which I enjoyed even more because it was about modernist art in Australia.  The speakers were Rodney James, whose book Letters to a Critic (2023) I reviewed here; Lesley Harding, director of the Heidi Museum of Modern Art; and Kendrah Morgan who is a curator at Heide.  Harding and Morgan co-authored Mirka and Georges (2020);  Modern Love, the lives of John and Sunday Reed (2015); Sunday’s Garden (2013) and Sunday’s Kitchen (2011); and Harding is also author of Margaret Preston, recipes for food and art, (2016) which we have on our shelves with our other art books. The panel chair was Charlotte Guest who is a bookseller and publisher.

The discussion led off with Rodney James talking about the art critic Alan McCulloch, which was an excellent launching pad for talking about the famous Herald Art Show in 1939 which brought all kinds of wonderful modernist art to Australians who’d never seen it before.  The whole collection got stranded here because of the war, and so the artworks were offered for sale, but *deep sigh* the stuffy old NGV passed up the opportunity to buy a Picasso and what they did buy was not very exciting.

From there the talk (with accompanying slide show) moved on to Arthur Boyd and Albert Tucker, art patrons John and Sunday Reed, Mirka Mora and Joy Hester.  It also segued to our famous Angry Penguins Literary Hoax which made a stunning appearance in Stephen Orr’s Sincerely, Ethel Malley (2021, see my review) – a good scandal is always fun at a festival.


Next up was The Legacy of Holocaust Literature, and the speakers were Leah Kaminsky, Michael Gawenda and Rachel Unreich.

Leah Kaminsky is the author of The Waiting Room (2015, see here); The Hollow Bones, and Doll’s Eye (2023, see here); Michael Gawenda is the former editor-in-chief of The Age and the author of My Life as a Jew (2023, which The Spouse is currently reading. See here.) Rachel Unreich is a journalist whose book A Brilliant Life (2023) is about her mother who survived the Holocaust.

The first question was why?  Why is there still such huge interest in the histories, memoirs, testimonies, novels, poetry, documentaries and films by and about survivors and the generation that came after them?

Michael Gawenda noted that at first there was a great silence followed by an outpouring in the 1960s and 70s.   That writing, he said, took place because it was part of the European tradition of literature, and because Jews were central to European civilisation.  OTOH There isn’t much about the Armenian genocide because it was not in their tradition to write about it and also there isn’t much in the way of documentary evidence in the way that there is for the Holocaust.

[LH: He didn’t say that acknowledgement of the Armenian Genocide has been suppressed by the Turkish government for decades and that it famously tried to prosecute the Nobel Prize winning author Orhan Pamuk for raising the issue.   I’ve read a couple of recent novels that tell this important story, both of them by Australians: Katerina Cosgrove’s Bone Ash Sky (2013, see my review here) and Ashley Kalagian Blunt’s award-winning My Name is Revenge (2018, see here).

Leah Kaminsky talked about her most recent book Doll’s Eye which explores the role of doctors and medical scientists during the years of Hitler’s rise to power.  Their research was garbage, but it became influential because it wasn’t challenged.  She also talked about her previous book The Hollow Bones, which was about her mother who committed suicide when Kaminsky was 21.

By contrast, Rachel Unreich’s book was about how her mother, who had experienced unspeakable horrors, had somehow managed to have a ‘joyful’ life in spite of it.  Gawenda demurred on this because, he says, for survivors there never was a happy ending.  FWIW I think they are both right.  In the Holocaust Museum here in Melbourne I met survivors who were laughing and gossiping in a place that I associated with the gravitas of deep mourning.  But, they told me, they had rebuilt a good life here in Australia with children and grandchildren in a thriving community and for them to live well was the best answer to what had happened to them.  But I don’t doubt that there were deep scars within.

Which is where the current crop of commercial Holocaust fiction is so wrong.  Gawenda says that he was not traumatised by the DP camp he was born in, but books which romanticise the Holocaust are appalling, exploitative, cynical and untrue. Redemption stories are a lie.  People were scarred and horribly traumatised, even if they masked their feelings for their children’s sake.

It was a sobering session.


Next up was Charlotte Wood in conversation with Ramona Koval and it was the highlight of my day.  She talked about the genesis of Stone Yard Devotional (See my review) which coincided with traumatising events in her personal life, and Covid.

She talked about the appeal of ‘deep silence’ and how she’s valued a couple of writing retreats she’s done, because it’s a way of getting away from an overwhelming life.  We’re not made to absorb the violence and catastrophe that comes from the media because we can’t do anything about it, and it’s everywhere.  But the ethical question raised by the book is: when is it ok to withdraw? Though the novel doesn’t really resolve this, it shows that the narrator’s life has all been action, which has achieved nothing, and she comes to realise that the nuns, ‘doing nothing’ except praying is actually doing no harm because they are not endlessly consuming.

Amongst other interesting things in a very interesting session was the idea that a writer must please the reader, but must also please herself.  Sometimes that means leaving things open-ended.

They concluded with a droll commentary about how much contemporary publishing is about people emoting instead of thinking.  Amen to that!

See more about Charlotte Wood in Sunday’s post.


My last session was political: former ABC radio presenter John Faine with journalist Greg Sheridan from The Australian and Director of the Lowy Institute Think Tank Sam Roggaveen about Australia’s place in the world.  The consensus was that AUKUS is a waste of money, and that China might/might not be as scary as we’re being led to think, but I was too tired to take notes and don’t want to misquote anybody.

More tomorrow!

The titular Brief Notes on the Art and Manner of Arranging One’s Books is one of nine short pieces in a Perec collection in the Penguin Books Great Ideas series. There are 94 titles altogether:  I’ve previously read The Narrative of Trajan’s Column (2020), by Italo Calvino, translated by Martin McLaughlin (see my review); on the TBR I also have Reflections on the Guillotine by Albert Camus, translated by Justin O’Brien.

It is accurate to call this collection ‘brief notes’ because they mostly are, though the first one ‘Robert Antelme or the Truth of Literature’ is more of an essay… a meditation on the literature of the camps after the Holocaust.  It was written in 1962, when Perec was not to know that what he thought was a flood of testimonies represented survivors’ irresistible urge to write:

For the returning deportee, to speak, to write, is a need as strong and immediate as is his need for calcium, for sugar, for sunlight, meat, sleep and silence.  It’s not the case that he can remain silent and forget.  He has first of all to remember.  he has to explain, to tell, to dominate that world whose victim he was. (p.3)

As we now know, this was nonsense, and for many survivors,  a reluctance to give testimony persisted well into old age.  But still, this is a very interesting essay exploring the work of Robert Antelme, (1917-1990) who had married Marguerite Duras in 1939 and was deported to  Buchenwald, and then Gandersheim because of his activities with the French Resistance.  Perec’s essay led me to these thoughts at the Washington Post about Antelme’s 1947 The Human Race book when it was finally translated into English in 1992.  Which made me wonder not for the first time about how tardy we are in the English-speaking world about translating important books.

Anyway…


It’s always nice to enjoy a bit of frivolity after reading sobering books, and like any bibliophile, I enjoyed Brief Notes on the Art and Manner of Arranging One’s Books.  I can never resist those articles that crop up online about how books can be arranged.

Perec tells us about a friend who had the notion to maintain his home library at 361 books, meaning that he could not buy another book until he had disposed of one to make space for it.  Like all of us pretending to be in control of the TBR, he soon found ways to subvert himself.  For example, a book could count as one book even if it contained more than one novel.  So Nothing, Doting Blindness by Henry Green counts as one book, of course! The rule is ‘adjusted’ to mean 361 authors…

But that needs to be ‘adjusted’ too, on account of those pesky books that have no author — chivalric romances or the Dadaists who can’t be separated without automatically losing 80 to 90 percent of what made them interesting. So far, adjusting the rule to mean 361 subjects, Perec tells us, is working out ok so far.

Hah!

There are two main problems when one has books: they are a problem of space, and a problem of order…

Books are not dispersed but assembled.  Just as we put all the pots of jam into a jam cupboard, so we put all our books in the same place, or into several same places.  (p.63)

Indeed. My ‘several’ same places are: my library, the sitting-room, the bedrooms (2); The Spouse’s office, and the family room. We conform to what Perec says about how you can only put cookery books in the room you cook in, (though truth be told, they are facing the other way into the family room).

 

As an aside, Perec lists ‘things which aren’t books but are often met with in libraries’, and yes I have some items from his list: photos, a pen and ink drawing by children’s author Ann James, and a dried flower thingy (a relic from a mother’s day stall). I also have some bookish memorabilia including Don Quixote from Spain, and Arcimboldo from the Netherlands. Plus little busts of Shakespeare and Dickens; Plato and Socrates have moved down to the Philosophy shelves in the family room.  Not in Perec’s list since he wrote it in 1978 is my computer and peripherals.

Nor does he mention the importance of A View.  I look out of my window at a rampant white jasmine, where finches, pigeons and the occasional parrot frolic and/or build their nests.  For advice on achieving a suitable bookspace + view, you can’t do better than visit Marina Sofia’s blog where bookshelves feature regularly in her Friday Fun series.

Next, Perec attends to the business of Order.

A library that is not arranged becomes disarranged. […]
Disorder in a library is not serious in itself; it ranks with ‘Which drawer did I put my socks in?’ We always think we shall know instinctively where we have put such and such a book.  And even if we don’t know, it will never be difficult to go rapidly along all the shelves. (p.65-6)

Hmm.  Maybe not as easy as he thinks if the books are double shelved…

Opposed to this apologia for a sympathetic disorder is the small-minded temptation towards an individual bureaucracy: one thing for each place and each place for one thing, and vice versa. Between these two tensions, one which sets a premium on letting things be, on a good-natured anarchy, the other that exalts the virtues of a tabula rasa, the cold efficiency of the great arranging, one always ends by trying to set one’s books in order. (p.66)

Oh yes…

Now, here is Perec’s list of ways of arranging books:

ordered alphaetically
ordered by continent or country
ordered by colour
ordered by date of acquisition
ordered by date of publication
ordered by format
ordered by genre
ordered by major periods of literary history
ordered by language
ordered by priority for future reading
ordering by binding
ordered by series.

NB Stable classifications are those which, in principle, you continue to respect; provisional classifications are those supposed to last only a few days, the time it takes for a book to discover, or rediscover, its definitive place. 

Over to you, dear reader.  How do you arrange your shelves?


PS I am off to the Sorrento LitFest this weekend.  I have ambitions to blog the sessions I attend but if internet access is unreliable, or I have too many martinis at dinner, please chat amongst yourselves until I get back.

Author: Georges Perec
Title: Brief Notes on the Art and Manner of Arranging One’s Books
Translated by John Sturrock
Publisher: Penguin Great Ideas series, Penguin Random House, 2020
Cover artwork by David Pearson
ISBN: 9780241475218, pbk., 96 pages
Source: Personal library, purchased from Readings $19.99

 

Historian and biographer Ross McMullen, won the Prime Minister’s Literary Award in 2013, for this multi-biography Farewell, Dear People, Biographies of Australia’s Lost Generation.  It’s a book I chose to dip into, for a commemorative post on Anzac Day.

For Australia, a new nation with a relatively small population, the death of 60,000 soldiers during World War I was catastrophic. It is hardly surprising, then, that Australians evaluating the consequences of the conflict have tended to focus primarily on the numbing number of losses ― on the sheer quantity of all those countrymen who did not return.

That there must have been extraordinary individuals among them has been implicitly understood, but these special Australians are unknown today. This book seeks to retrieve their stories and to fill the gaps in our collective memory. Farewell, Dear People contains ten extended biographies of young men who exemplified Australia’s gifted lost generation of World War I.

This is a book that celebrates achievements that took place before the war that claimed these men’s lives. Their stories tell us that we should let not let the manner of their deaths overshadow the lives they led beforehand.

These names will not be known to most people, but I list them here from the Table of Contents:

  • Geoff McCrea: the creative allrounder
  • Tom Elliott: Australia’s Kitchener
  • George Challis: the footballer
  • Ted Larkin: the administrator/politician
  • Clunes Mathison: the medical scientist
  • Robert Bage: the engineer/explorer
  • Gresley Harper, Winifred Harper and Phipps Turnbull: the barrister, the farmer, and the Rhodes scholar
  • Carew Reynell: the winemaker.

Robert Bage, photographed by Frank Hurley.

Robert Bage’s name is in Bold, because it is his story that I chose to read first.

Readers with good memories may remember my fascination with the Heroic Age of Exploration and my review of Douglas Mawson’s 1915 The Home of the Blizzard. Bage (1888-1915) was the astronomer at the Main Base during the Australasian Antarctic Expedition.


In some ways, Robert Bage led a life of privilege, but his father died when he was only three, and his paternal grandparents died shortly afterwards.  However his Uncle Charles Lange was a doctor with good connections both social and professional, and so Robert was able to attend Melbourne Grammar where his father and uncles had all been educated. He was an excellent student, winning prizes and matriculating at the age of only 14.  However, he stayed on to prepare further for university with study in the sciences, achieving honours in physics and chemistry, algebra and geometry.

While Bage’s friends had prominent and successful fathers, he did not.  Ted Bage had been prominent and successful many years earlier, but he had been absent for practically all his son’s life.  Bob was accustomed to this state of affairs, and it did not hold him back.  He and his sisters exuded capable, practical self-reliance. (p.329)

A scholarship enabled him to enter Trinity college and study engineering. He was active in university sports and with friends he went adventuring, hiking in the hills around Melbourne.  He travelled further afield in outback South Australia, and between terms, to Canada as a supernumerary engineer on the Moana.

After graduation he took up work with Victoria’s State Rivers and Water Supply, and then with the Queensland Railways.  It was there that he volunteered for the militia and came under the influence of Kitchener of imperial fame.  Bage decided to join the army as an engineer, taking leave of absence to join the explorer Douglas Mawson (1882-1958) on the Antarctic expedition that made his name.  

McMullen recounts the ins and outs of Bage’s activities on the expedition, described in 1928 as the greatest and most consummate expedition that ever sailed for Antarctica.  

Some 20,000 miles of coast had been explored for the first time.  The expedition had accomplished significant research advances in geology, cartography, meteorology, biology, magnetism and oceanography.  Radio communication in Antarctica was successfully pioneered. (p.372)

The exalted position among other Antarctic expeditions’ was in part because of the southern sledging party led by Bage.

They ‘accomplished even more than I had anticipated’, Mawson acknowledged.  It was one of the most arduous trips undertaken by any sledging party,’ wrote Charles Laseron; it was ‘a tribute to their endurance and determination that they pulled through at all.’ Bage, Webb, and Hurley still retain the record for distance covered in a day’s sledge-hauling, and it is inconceivable that it will ever be broken. (p.373)

But as those of us who have read The Home of the Blizzard know, some of these accomplishments were overshadowed by the tragic loss of Mertz and Ninnis and Mawson’s heroic struggle back to base alone. McMullen shows how these events impacted on Bage and other members of the team.  When Mawson had not returned by the time their supply ship had to depart before the ice froze over, a rescue team had to stay and overwinter for a second year.

For the half-dozen named, though, this was a dismal prospect.  They had been anticipating with relish their imminent return after a year of isolation in this windy wilderness.  Moreover, staying a further year had other consequences.  Bage was concerned that it would cost him his military seniority; Madigan was concerned that it would cost him his Rhodes scholarship.  But they accepted that some expeditioners had to stay.  Mawson was now a week overdue.  It was increasingly likely that a serious mishap had befallen his party: ‘we are all extremely anxious about him,’ Bage wrote. (p.364)

They had a bleak and dreary time during this second year, but they did their duty… arriving back in Australia 1914 to great acclaim and a round of after-dinner speaking engagements.  McCullen notes that after living cooped up in a hut in an all-male environment, half the expeditioners married soon after their return.  Bage became engaged to Dorothy Scantlebury* shortly after the outbreak of war in September, but since he was a member of the regular army, he was subject to immediate mobilisation and his company left for Egypt later that same month.

In May, he was killed at Gallipoli.

As McMullen says in the Introduction, these premature deaths represented a significant post-war loss for their nation because of their outstanding pre-war accomplishment or their outstanding character or both.  His purpose in resurrecting the stories of the men in this book is not to eulogise their deaths as mattering more than any others, but to show that amongst the thousands who died, there were exceptional men whose rare potential should not be forgotten. 


*Dorothy came from a notable Cheltenham family in the bayside suburb of Melbourne.  In 1919, Dorothy was teaching at Clyde school Mt Macedon, and went on to become Principal of Toorak College in 1942 ‐ the Scantlebury girls ‘old school’. (See Cheltenham’s Scantlebury Family 1889-1923)

Image credit: Robert Bage by Frank Hurley – State Library of New South Wales, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=14751010Australasian Antarctic Expedition: 

Author: Ross McMullen
Title: Farewell, Dear People, Biographies of Australia’s Lost Generation
Publisher: Scribe Publishing, 2012
Cover design: “by Scribe”
ISBN: 9781921844669, pbk., 600 pages, including Maps, a Bibliography, Notes Acknowledgements and an Index. The text runs to 531 pages.
Source: Personal library, purchased from Readers’ Feast, $45.00

 

Posted by: Lisa Hill | April 23, 2024

2024 The Age Book of the Year shortlist

Update 8/5/24 The winners were announced today.  Women and Children won the fiction award, and Life So Full of Promise won the non fiction award.  Congratulations!


The Age Book of the Year shortlists have been announced.

The judges for the fiction prize were bookseller Mark Rubbo and writer and publisher Louise Swinn.  The shortlisted titles are:

Women & Children, by Tony Birch, on my TBR, see my review
Anniversary, by Stephanie Bishop
One Day We’re All Going to Die, by Elise Hearst, see my review
The Idealist, by Nicholas Jose, see my review
Stone Yard Devotional, by Charlotte Wood, see my review
But the Girl, by Jessica Zhan Mei Yu


 

The books on the non-fiction shortlist, judged by writer Simon Caterson and historian Joy Damousi, include histories, memoirs and essays.

Bennelong & Phillip: A History Unravelled, by Kate Fullagar
Home Work: Essays on Love and Housekeeping, by Helen Hayward
Frank Moorhouse: Strange Paths, by Matthew Lamb (I’m currently reading, it’s excellent.)
Life So Full of Promise: Further Biographies of Australia’s Lost Generation, by Ross McMullin (I’m currently reading the predecessor of this one, Farewell Dear People.  Review coming soon.)
Personal Score by Ellen van Neerven
A Brilliant Life, by Rachelle Unreich.

The winners will be announced on May 8.


Last year’s winners were Limberlost by Robbie Arnott, and Wandering with Intent by Kim Mahood.  Both were great books, see my reviews here and here.

The Postcard was a finalist for the Goncourt Prize, and a bestseller in France. And that’s interesting, because everybody’s favourite tourist destination doesn’t come out of it very well in this story that is a mystery, a portrait of Parisian intellectual and artistic life in the 20th century, and a devastating portrayal of how antisemitism still lingers in the France which deported so many French Jews to their deaths in Germany.

But first, the cover image.  I was still reading the first of four parts in this book when it occurred to me to look for the source of the arresting portrait on the cover.  It’s not a cleverly chosen stock image, it’s an authentic photo of Noémie Rabinovitch in 1941. Born in 1923 in Latvia, she was the younger sister of Anne Berest’s grandmother, Myriam.  She wanted to be a writer.

And while we should never make the mistake of mourning the loss of attractive people in the Holocaust more than those who are less appealing to look at, the intelligence and vitality of that young woman is a reminder that the Holocaust was a loss to humanity.  The world lost scientists, artists, musicians, inventors and writers, as well as ‘ordinary’ people who deserved to live just as much as anyone else.  What might that young woman have done with her life had she lived?

She might have written a magnificent book like this one.

The prologue begins with the postcard in the narrator’s mother’s ‘archive’.  Anne tells the story of Lélia receiving it in 2003, when she was twenty-four:

What caught my mother’s attention right away was the handwriting, strange and awkward, like no handwriting she had ever seen before.  Then she read the four names, written in the form of a list.

Ephraim
Emma
Noémie
Jacques (p.12)

And that was all, nothing else, except the stamp and the address.

The family knows who these people are.  They were Léila’s maternal grandparents and her aunt and uncle.  They were all deported from France and had died in Auschwitz in 1942, more than sixty years ago.

My mother felt a jolt of fear, as if someone were threatening her, someone lurking in the darkness of the past. Her hands began to tremble. (p.12)

Now, years later after an antisemitic incident at her daughter’s school, the narrator, Anne — a secular Jew — embarks on a quest to find out who sent this enigmatic postcard.  It seems impossible, but the book tells an intriguing tale of leads and red herrings drawn from her mother’s recollections and rambling stories.  A private detective helps, and so does a graphologist, both of them somewhat overwhelmed by the task because they usually work with pettier quests.  People who knew these four people are dead now, but descendants of those who knew the sole surviving sibling Myriam, sometimes know a scrap of information, leading to stories of flight, of the French Resistance, and of venal complicity.

I wanted to stop reading at the end of Part 1 ‘Promised Lands’.  Through Léila’s memories, I had come to know Ephraim, Emma, Noémie and Jacques, and when their lives came to an end about half way through the book, I was devastated. Berest had brought these people back to life in an extraordinary way; I was invested in them even though I knew their fate. But the rest of the story is just as rivetting. And Berest does not flinch from revealing the French betrayal of its Jewish citizens under the Vichy government.

The rest of the book recounts the quest and why it matters.  Berest depicts the awkwardness that is encountered when people know something but won’t tell.  There is still shame, and guilt, and people still have in their possession items that belong to descendants of those betrayed.  A scene when Léila ‘steals’ some photos from a man who lived in her parents’ village, is ironic. Anne remonstrates, and Léila retorts by saying that he can’t complain, he’s still got the beautiful old piano that Emma used to play.

The  postwar chaos when Myriam waits anxiously in Paris for her family’s return is very poignant.  Since she’s had no news, her assumption is that they are alive somewhere.  At this stage of human history, not everything is known.  So — day after day — she goes to the hotel hastily converted into a reception centre for people returning from the camps. She vacillates between hope, denial and despair, and refuses to take the advice to stay home and listen to the radio announcing the names.  This cruel, impersonal way of telling people about the fate of their loved ones seems incomprehensible today, but all over Europe authorities were overwhelmed by what had happened.  There was no plan.  And in some places, it was a problem that authorities did not want to confront.  They wanted these problem survivors gone; they wanted to move on.  They certainly did not want to interrogate the past.

The book is also a meditation on what it means to be Jewish when not observant at all… It’s an identity that cannot be shaken off, and it shapes a life, even for secular Jews. Because she doesn’t announce her Jewish heritage, Anne is sometimes taken for a Jew and sometimes not, and these assumptions lead to droll scenes when Anne is out of place and ignorant of the rituals to follow at services — both Jewish and Christian.  Her mother reminds her about the rules for using cutlery, but Anne doesn’t know the words or the songs and pronounces Amen/Oy-men incorrectly and so on.  (Having been to Anglican, Catholic, Jewish and secular funerals and marriages, I can relate to this embarrassment and confusion!)

The Postcard explores the emotions of the past and present and the repercussions which filter down to the present day, including the tension between those who want healing from acknowledging the past, and those who are afraid, for all sorts of reasons, of digging it up.  The ending, which reveals that they did indeed find out who sent the postcard and why, shows that it came from a very human impulse, and wasn’t malevolent at all.

The book is a work of autofiction, with names changed to protect the guilty.  The author did not want to shame the descendants of those who betrayed her family, her community, the Resistance and her country.  And no, the postcard is not an authorial invention; it really was sent to the author’s mother.

Author: Anne Berest
Title: The Postcard (La carte postale)
Translated from the French by Tina Kover
Cover design by Ginevra Rapisardi
Publisher: Europa Editions, 2023, first published 2021
ISBN: 9781609458386, pbk, 464 pages
Source: Kingston Library

Older Posts »

Categories